assistant: For mild overpronation at 30 mi/wk, you want a modern stability shoe that guides without feeling clunky — and the **ASICS Gel-Kayano v32** is your top pick here. The Kayano v32 is a heritage stability shoe that's evolved into a genuinely runnable daily trainer. It features mild stability support (guide rails rather than old-school posts) paired with high cushioning and a 40/32mm stack that absorbs impact well. Run Moore notes it has "strong durability and support," and with 500+ miles of life, it's built to handle your weekly mileage. One caveat: it runs narrow in the forefoot, so if you have wider feet, that could be a fit issue. If you want a lighter, more versatile option that still handles mild overpronation well, the **Saucony Ride v19** is a solid alternative — a traditional daily trainer with high cushioning, no plate, and a more accommodating fit. EDDBUD calls it "a dependable, traditional daily trainer" with a wider heel and better outsole than prior versions, making it a good all-arounder for neutral to mildly overpronating runners. The **Adidas Supernova Rise v3** is the budget pick at $140 if you want to rotate shoes. It's rated neutral, so it's less ideal for overpronation than the Kayano, but it's a well-regarded daily trainer with solid value — just know you'd be relying more on fit and personal biomechanics than on built-in stability. A quick follow-up: when you say you overpronate, was that diagnosed by a gait analysis, or is it something you've noticed? And do you have any current shoes you're training in — knowing what's worked for you before would help confirm the Kayano is the right fit.

assistant: The **Brooks Adrenaline GTS v25** is still a solid overpronation shoe, but it's been outpaced by the **ASICS Gel-Kayano v32** for daily training at your mileage. Here's the real difference: Doctors of Running notes the Adrenaline's DNA Loft v3 midsole "lacks bounce and firms up uncomfortably on longer runs" — it's better suited for walking and short-to-moderate distance than the 30 mi/wk you're running. The Kayano v32, by contrast, is genuinely runnable across all paces. Doctors of Running calls it "the best and most runnable Kayano he has ever tested," with a smoother transition, snappier ride, and full-length stability guidance that doesn't feel clunky. Both shoes have mild stability for overpronation, but the Kayano's 40/32mm stack (vs. Adrenaline's 39/29mm) gives you more cushioning for the volume you're logging, and the lower 8mm drop (same as the Adrenaline's new spec) feels more modern and responsive. The Adrenaline's 10mm drop is actually a step back from earlier versions — Doctors of Running credits the new 10mm for better heel transition, but the trade-off is a midsole that gets stiff and boring past 7–8 miles. **The catch:** the Kayano runs narrow in the forefoot. If your Adrenaline fits well, that's a signal your feet are standard width, so you'd likely need to size up in width on the Kayano. Run Moore sized up to 4E. If the Kayano's fit is a concern, the **Saucony Ride v19** is a worthy alternative — neutral (not stability), but it has a wider heel and better outsole than prior versions, plus high cushioning for your mileage. You'd be trading built-in stability for a more accommodating fit and a lighter feel. Are you currently happy with the Adrenaline's fit, or is the narrowness or stiffness on longer runs something you've noticed?