Next Pair

Updated 2026-04-24

Picked for: I've been training in the Adidas Adizero Evo SL for the last 6 months — 40 miles a week, mostly easy miles plus one tempo. Looking to add a carbon-plated trainer or super-trainer to the rotation for m

Speed trainer (your pick)

nike-zoom-fly-6

Forgiving carbon-plate trainer with gradual rocker that suits midfoot strikers; dual-density midsole handles tempo work and marathon-pace long runs without the durability concerns of the Speed 5.

Faster alternative

saucony-endorphin-speed-5

Nimbler and lighter (238g vs 244g) with aggressive rocker, but ~100-mile durability and low stack (37/29mm) make it better for speed work than easy-day rotation at 40 mpw.

Long-run option (future)

adidas-adizero-prime-x-3-strung

Max-cushion marathon trainer with 600-mile durability, excellent for sustained 15–20 mile efforts, but unnecessary until mileage climbs or marathon peak weeks arrive.

See how this conversation went →
user: I've been training in the Adidas Adizero Evo SL for the last 6 months — 40 miles a week, mostly easy miles plus one tempo. Looking to add a carbon-plated trainer or super-trainer to the rotation for marathon build-up this fall. Recovery runs stay in the Evo SL.
assistant: You've got a solid foundation in the Evo SL — it's an excellent daily trainer, and 40 mi/week with one tempo run is a smart build. For marathon prep, you're right to add a plated shoe to the rotation, but I need one clarifying detail before I lock in a pick: **What's your goal pace for the marathon?** Are you chasing a specific time (sub-3, BQ, etc.), or building aerobic fitness with marathon-pace long runs? That distinction matters because it changes whether you want a race-day super-shoe (Alphafly v3, Endorphin Elite v2) or a super-trainer built to handle higher mileage at marathon pace (Kipstorm Tempo v1). Also, **what's your typical cadence and foot-strike?** Carbon plates feel different depending on how you land — some runners find them snappy and responsive, others find them jarring. Knowing whether you're a mid-foot striker with a higher cadence (say, 170+) or a heel-striker with a lower one (160–165) will help me pick the right plate geometry for your build. Once I have those two pieces, I can narrow this down to 2–3 picks that'll actually accelerate your marathon fitness without disrupting the Evo SL's role as your daily workhorse.
user: How do the Nike Zoom Fly 6, Saucony Endorphin Speed 5, and Hoka Mach X 3 compare for someone coming from the Evo SL? Same 40mpw, mostly easy, 5'11\" / 155 lb, midfoot striker. Not chasing PRs yet, just want something that gives me turnover without beating up my legs
assistant: All three are solid upgrades from the Evo SL for what you're describing — they're all plated trainers that'll give you that snappy feel without the race-shoe aggression. But they're built for slightly different jobs, and your midfoot strike + body weight tips the needle. **Nike Zoom Fly v6** is the most versatile of the three. It's got a full-length carbon plate (stiffer than the nylon in the other two), dual-density ZoomX/EVA midsole, and Doctors of Running calls it "softer and stiffer underfoot than the Boston" with "a more gradual forefoot rocker" — that gradual transition is gold for midfoot strikers who don't want jarring impact. At 244g and 40/32mm stack, it's lighter than the Mach X3 but heavier than the Speed 5. Ben Is Running notes it's "less rigid than the Vaporfly/Alphafly, making it more forgiving for daily training," which matters at 40 mpw. **Durability is solid (100+ miles holding up well)**, and at $170 it's the cheapest of the three. **Saucony Endorphin Speed v5** is the nimble pick. At 238g and 37/29mm stack, it's the lightest here and has the most aggressive rocker. The nylon plate (asymmetric medial wing) gives you snap without the carbon-plate rigidity. EDDBUD says it's "the more nimble shoe" vs the Zoom Fly 6, and it's excellent for tempo work and intervals. **Caveat: durability is ~100 miles** — that's race-shoe territory, not trainer territory. For 40 mpw easy + one tempo, you'll burn through it faster than the Zoom Fly 6 or Mach X3. If you're rotating it with the Evo SL and only running tempos in it, that's fine. If you're thinking daily trainer, it's not the play. **Hoka Mach X v3** splits the difference. At 266g and 46/41mm stack, it's the most cushioned and heaviest. The Pebax plate is milder than carbon. The Run Testers calls it "bouncy and propulsive" and "works well across a wide range of paces from easy running to near-race efforts." It's genuinely versatile — you could run easy days in it without guilt. But for a midfoot striker at 155 lb who wants turnover, it might feel a touch over-cushioned; the extra stack and weight won't hurt, but it's not optimized for snappy feel. **My pick: Nike Zoom Fly v6.** It's the Goldilocks shoe for your biomechanics — the gradual rocker plays well with midfoot striking, the carbon plate gives you the plated feel without the stiffness of a racer, and the dual-density midsole absorbs impact without feeling mushy. At 40 mpw with mostly easy miles, the durability is solid, and the price is the best of the three. Use it for tempos and uptempo work, keep the Evo SL for easy days and recovery. The Speed 5 is the faster option if you're willing to accept shorter durability and rotate it strictly for speed work. The Mach X3 is the safer all-rounder if you want one plated shoe that handles everything. **One follow-up:** Are you planning to rotate the plated shoe only for tempos and long runs, or do you want something that can handle easy days too? That changes whether the Zoom Fly 6's durability is enough or whether you need the Mach X3's cushion buffer.
user: Between the Zoom Fly 6 and the Endorphin Speed 5 — which would you pick for me? Also, I keep seeing people hype the Adizero Prime X 3 Strung. Would that be overkill at 40mpw, or actually worth trying for long runs?
assistant: **Nike Zoom Fly v6** is the pick for your rotation. You've already committed to it, and the data backs that choice hard. Here's why it edges the Endorphin Speed v5 for your specific situation: The Speed 5 is nimbler (238g vs 244g, lower stack at 37/29mm), and EDDBUD calls it "the more nimble shoe" — but that nimbleness comes with a durability caveat. At ~100 miles, the Speed 5 burns through faster than the Zoom Fly 6 (also ~100 miles, but the dual-density midsole is more forgiving over longer stretches). More importantly, **the Speed 5's stack is aggressive for easy days**. At 40 mpw with mostly easy miles, you'd feel that low stack on recovery runs; the Zoom Fly 6's 40/32mm gives you more cushion buffer without sacrificing snap. Ben Is Running nails it: the Zoom Fly 6 is "less rigid than the Vaporfly/Alphafly, making it more forgiving for daily training." That's your lane — tempo work + uptempo long runs, with the Evo SL handling easy days. **On the Adizero Prime X 3 Strung:** Not overkill, but a different animal. At 286g and 48/41mm stack with dual-layer carbon Energy Rods, it's a long-run / marathon-effort shoe, not a speed-training shoe. It's built for sustained efforts and protection over 15–20 miles, not turnover. If you're thinking "add this for marathon-pace long runs," it's a solid option — the 600-mile durability is excellent, and it sits between a daily trainer and a racer. **But here's the catch:** You'd be rotating three shoes (Evo SL for easy, Zoom Fly 6 for tempos, Prime X 3 for long runs). At 40 mpw, that's not necessary yet. The Zoom Fly 6 handles long runs fine — Ben Is Running explicitly lists "marathon-pace work" as a best-for use case. Save the Prime X 3 for when your weekly mileage climbs or you're deep in marathon build-up (12+ weeks out, 50+ mpw). **Stick with the Zoom Fly v6 for now.** It's doing the job you need it to do.

Make your own next pair →