Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4
Adidas

Adizero Adios Pro 4

Race shoe · Lightstrike Pro · carbon plate

Open shoe page
ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo
ASICS

Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo

Race shoe · FF Turbo Plus · carbon plate

Open shoe page

Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 vs ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 5 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 5
FORDY RUNS, EDDBUD, Ben Parkes, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

39 / 33 mm heel / forefoot
Stack
40 / 35 mm +2mm forefoot
6 mm
Drop
5 mm
7.1 oz 201 g
Weight
5.6 oz 159 g · −42 g
Lightstrike Pro supercritical TPEE
Midsole
FF Turbo Plus (PEBA) top + FF Leap (A-TPU) base
Full-length carbon Energy Rods 2.0
Plate
Flat carbon fiber plate higher midsole placement
Engineered mesh (Micro Fit one-way stretch)
Upper
MOTION WRAP 3.0
$220 $50 less
MSRP
$270

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Heavier and cushier with a more protective heel landing. Less forefoot pop and energy return. Better value at a lower MSRP and frequently discounted. May suit marathon runners wanting more comfort, but both reviewers preferred the ASICS overall.

— The Run Testers on the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4, source

Mentioned as a viable alternative in a similar price category

— Kofuzi on the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo, source

Adios Pro 4 is much narrower in the toe; Sky has notably more forefoot room

— Believe in the Run on the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo, source

Lighter with more forefoot pop and energy return. Slightly less cushy and protective at the heel but faster feeling overall. Preferred by both reviewers for race day across all distances.

— The Run Testers on the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo, source

Tokyo's softer direction mirrors the Adios Pro getting much softer between v3 and v4.

— EDDBUD on the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo, source

Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • A strong marathon race shoe once fit is dialed in — the reviewer used it successfully at Chicago Marathon after making tweaks.

    Fit:Required some personal tweaks to dial in before it worked well for this reviewer.

    In their words: "worked out perfectly well"

    — FORDY RUNS , source
  • Works well for half/full marathon but too soft for shorter, faster distances, loses pep quickly, and its softer Lightstrike Pro foam is linked to rod-snapping issues. Tier C.

    In their words: "went a bit flat even quicker than Man City" · "just a few too many issues"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • Ben Parkes calls this probably the best-value super shoe on the market, lightweight and fast, and a strong marathon race-day option.

    Ride:Reviewer describes carbon rods (rather than a single plate) giving a similar propulsive effect.

    In their words: "probably the best value super shoe" · "Lightweight, fast, used by so many"

    — Ben Parkes , source
  • The most comfortable of Ben's three race day picks — carbon rods instead of a plate allow more natural movement, making it an excellent choice for longer race distances.

    In their words: "most comfortable for me" · "can move a little bit more"

    — Ben Is Running , source

ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo — what reviewers say

Ride profile: maximal cushion , neutral stability .

  • A popular, versatile race shoe that works well for most runners, though this reviewer personally struggles with blistering in it.

    Fit:This reviewer personally gets blistering in this shoe due to its setup, despite generally getting on well with other ASICS shoes.

    In their words: "a bit of a bargain"

    — FORDY RUNS , source
  • Ran a 2:24 marathon at Loch Ness in the Sky Tokyo; the dual-density FF Leap/Turbo Plus midsole and high forefoot plate give a very bouncy ride he rates just behind the Fast-R Nitro Elite 3.

    In their words: "really bouncy shoe" · "a lot of spring"

    — The Run Testers , source
  • A great marathon-paced racer, though the softer midsole and flatter plate feel less versatile across paces than the previous Sky, with foam durability a slight concern. Tier B.

    In their words: "a great shoe, though very much anchored in marathon pace" · "the foam does really take a beating"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • A very fast, lightweight racing shoe the reviewer uses for shorter race distances (5K/10K), while preferring the Edge for half marathon and marathon.

    In their words: "extremely fast and very lightweight"

    — Ben Parkes , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 if

  • A marathon race-day shoe, also suited to 5K, 10K, and half marathon distances; good value since it's been out a couple of years. — Ben Parkes
  • Any distance from short reps to marathon racing — The Run Testers
  • Marathon racing; verdict deferred to 2025 list. — Kofuzi
  • Marathon racing where bounce and pop matter most — The Running Channel
  • The most versatile super shoe in the test — 5K through marathon. EDDBUD's overall winner at 19/25. — EDDBUD
  • Runners targeting marathon or longer who want cushioned protection and are comfortable with the fit; recommended for those running slower than sub-3 marathon pace — The Run Testers

Consider the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo if

  • A versatile, lightweight race shoe for a range of distances, including marathons. — Ben Parkes
  • 5K, 10K, and half marathon racing — particularly when going at top speed and striding out for a PB attempt — FORDY RUNS
  • Racing from 5K up to the marathon — The Run Testers
  • Races from 5K to marathon for runners who prefer a light, responsive, and poppy carbon plate shoe — The Run Testers
  • Marathon racing and any distance where a softer, bouncier carbon-plated feel is preferred, especially on undulating courses. — The Run Testers
  • Lighter runners who can maintain form over long races — EDDBUD

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 and the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo?

The Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 is a race shoe and the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo is a race shoe. By the numbers, the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 weighs 201g, has a 39mm heel stack and a 6mm drop, while the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo weighs 159g, has a 40mm heel stack and a 5mm drop. MSRP is $220 for the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 and $270 for the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo.

Should I buy the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 or the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo?

Ben Parkes on the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4: A marathon race-day shoe, also suited to 5K, 10K, and half marathon distances; good value since it's been out a couple of years. Ben Parkes on the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo: A versatile, lightweight race shoe for a range of distances, including marathons.

Per Ben Parkes.

Has anyone reviewed both the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 and the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo?

Yes — The Run Testers, Kofuzi, Believe in the Run, and EDDBUD directly compared the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 and the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo in their reviews.

Per The Run Testers, Kofuzi, Believe in the Run, EDDBUD.

Which is lighter, the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 or the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo?

The ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo is lighter, at 159g versus 201g (men's 9) — about 42g less.

Which is cheaper, the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 or the ASICS Metaspeed Sky/Edge Tokyo?

The Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 is cheaper at $220 versus $270 MSRP — about $50 less.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.