Adidas Adizero Evo SL vs ASICS Magic Speed 4
A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 6 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.
Specs at a glance
Adidas Adizero Evo SL — what reviewers say
Ride profile: high cushion , soft_plush feel , high energy return , neutral stability , aggressive rocker.
-
Ed Bud rates the Evo SL as a strong, fast shoe that many treat as a tempo option rather than a daily trainer; he personally finds the SC Rebel a little more enjoyable and versatile overall, but says the Evo SL still has a lot going for it, especially at a discount.
Ride:Lightstrike Pro foam has historically softened with wear across versions; some runners find it less stable on camber or debris because of the plate's position, though the reviewer rates it as stable relative to the SC Rebel and better at faster paces.
Fit:Minimal upper similar to the SC Rebel with comparable heel padding, though with a lower heel profile; no lockdown issues.
In their words: "feels like a tempo shoe" · "better shoe at pace" · "not the most stable"
-
The Run Testers consider the Adizero Evo SL the shoe that reset the price-to-performance bar for fast, versatile trainers, crediting it with reducing reliance on traditional dailies like the Pegasus, Ghost and Ride; after comparing it against nearly a dozen would-be rivals, none dethrone it as their default fast-training shoe.
Ride:Non-plated (nylon shank rather than a carbon plate), simple design with a genuine race-day-grade foam; very bouncy and energetic, naturally pushes pace faster, and is described as almost impossible to run slow in. Considered not the most stable shoe but very fun and fast, with an aggressive, high-rocker transition.
Fit:Upper tapers sharply around the little toe, which one reviewer found caused rubbing/a hot spot on a longer effort.
In their words: "a really good foam basically" · "really fun and it's fast" · "a lot of energy in it"
-
Ben Parkes enjoys this shoe for speed work and calls it great fun with a strong turn of speed, but flags a lack of stability as its main downside.
Ride:Very lightweight and fun to run fast in, using Lightstrike Pro super foam and a shank (rather than a plate) for stability.
In their words: "really good fun to run in" · "lack of stability"
-
Ben calls this one of the best shoes on the market right now — Light Strike Pro midsole with no plate makes it an outstanding speed and tempo option, though the soft, bouncy midsole may not suit runners needing stability.
In their words: "by far one of the best shoes on the market" · "midsole in this one is a little bit soft and bouncy"
ASICS Magic Speed 4 — what reviewers say
Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .
-
Matt frames the Magic Speed 4 as the firmer, snappier, more racing-leaning sibling to the Endorphin Speed 4 — better for short-to-moderate fast efforts but less suited to long runs.
Ride:Carbon plate plus an aggressive rocker make it noticeably snappier and firmer than the Endorphin Speed 4; excellent for short-to-moderate fast efforts but struggles on long runs because of firmness and stack height.
Fit:Snug, more racing-esque fit with a touch more vertical volume than the Endorphin Speed 4; stiff but padded heel counter.
-
Kofuzi calls it the best Magic Speed ASICS has made and the training companion he has been waiting for, but notes the tempo-shoe market is crowded and the Deviate Nitro 2 still edges it for him at $10 less.
Ride:Feels firm at warm-up paces but the firmness translates into a snappy compression-decompression at threshold and 10K-half-marathon efforts; reminiscent of a more mellowed-out Metaspeed Sky Plus.
Fit:Switched from a scratchy motion-wrap upper to a more traditional flexible, breathable mesh with a minimal tongue and a fairly floppy heel cup with light padding.
Who should buy which
Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.
Consider the Adidas Adizero Evo SL if
- Runners wanting a light, nimble, kick-car style ride at an attractive price — EDDBUD
- A fast, bouncy speed shoe that also works as an all-rounder for runners who don't need stability — The Run Testers
- Speed sessions — fartleks, tempos, and thresholds — sitting between a daily trainer and dedicated speed shoe. — Ben Parkes
- Runners wanting a versatile, bouncy trainer for tempo runs, speed work, and shorter-distance racing (5K-10K). — The Run Testers
- Runners with slightly wider feet and midfoot/forefoot strikers who want a responsive plateless super-foam up-tempo trainer — FORDY RUNS
- Runners looking for a fast, lightweight, versatile trainer that excels at track reps, intervals, tempo and cruisey workouts while still being comfortable for easy runs. — The Run Testers
Consider the ASICS Magic Speed 4 if
- Shorter, faster workouts and 10K-to-half-marathon racing; works for marathon training when you want a snappier tempo shoe. — Doctors of Running
- Tempo and threshold workouts, mile repeats, half- and full-marathon training blocks; suits Metaspeed Sky-leaning runners and bigger/taller runners who want extra firmness across paces. — Kofuzi
- Plated performance trainer for tempo, half-marathon training/racing, and even some easy runs once broken in. — Doctors of Running
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between the Adidas Adizero Evo SL and the ASICS Magic Speed 4?
The Adidas Adizero Evo SL is a speed trainer and the ASICS Magic Speed 4 is a speed trainer. By the numbers, the Adidas Adizero Evo SL weighs 235g, has a 37mm heel stack and a 7mm drop, while the ASICS Magic Speed 4 weighs 241g, has a 44mm heel stack and an 8mm drop. MSRP is $150 for the Adidas Adizero Evo SL and $170 for the ASICS Magic Speed 4.
Should I buy the Adidas Adizero Evo SL or the ASICS Magic Speed 4?
EDDBUD on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL: Runners wanting a light, nimble, kick-car style ride at an attractive price. Doctors of Running on the ASICS Magic Speed 4: Shorter, faster workouts and 10K-to-half-marathon racing; works for marathon training when you want a snappier tempo shoe.
Per EDDBUD, Doctors of Running.
Which is more cushioned, the Adidas Adizero Evo SL or the ASICS Magic Speed 4?
Measured by stack height, the ASICS Magic Speed 4 has more underfoot foam — 44mm at the heel versus 37mm.
Which is cheaper, the Adidas Adizero Evo SL or the ASICS Magic Speed 4?
The Adidas Adizero Evo SL is cheaper at $150 versus $170 MSRP — about $20 less.