ASICS Novablast 6
ASICS

Novablast 6

Daily trainer · FF BLAST MAX · no plate

Open shoe page
New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5
New Balance

FuelCell Rebel 5

Daily trainer · FuelCell · no plate

Open shoe page

ASICS Novablast 6 vs New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 7 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 7
The Run Testers, EDDBUD, FORDY RUNS, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

42 / 34 mm +2mm forefoot
Stack
38 / 32 mm heel / forefoot
8 mm
Drop
6 mm 2mm lower
8.8 oz 249 g
Weight
7.9 oz 224 g · −25 g
FF BLAST MAX (olefin EVA base) + FF TURBO² (ATPU) forefoot insert
Midsole
FuelCell PEBA blend with EVA
None
Plate
None
Recycled polyester woven
Upper
FantomFit engineered mesh
$155
MSRP
$145 $10 less

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Rebel is lighter and faster but Novablast 6 is similarly quick for speed workouts while being more comfortable

— The Run Testers on the ASICS Novablast 6, source

PEBA/EVA blend, lightweight, springy and smoother for him but less stable; retails $145

— Kofuzi on the ASICS Novablast 6, source

Similar cushion + peppiness + versatility; more padding in the heel, better for lifestyle doubling; Rebel v5 preferred for pure performance and more dynamic fuel cell; Novablast $150

— Kofuzi on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5, source

Similar daily-trainer category; Novablast slightly more cushioned and stable, but Rebel V5 is lighter and works better at speed

— The Run Testers on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5, source

Still a worthy alternative to the Rebel v5

— Kofuzi on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5, source

Grouped among the best ~$150 daily trainers alongside Rebel v5

— Believe in the Run on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5, source

Rebel v5 is lighter, lower, more direct, more responsive, and better at pace; Novablast has more cushion, more rocker, and more stability for heavier/newer runners

— The Run Testers on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5, source

Novablast has more stack height; Rebel is a middle ground — less stacked but more stable

— EDDBUD on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5, source

Novablast has ~6mm more heel stack, softer-but-more-returning FF Blast Max foam, more versatility for longer/recovery runs, and is cheaper; Rebel is lighter

— EDDBUD on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5, source

ASICS Novablast 6 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • The Run Testers describe the Novablast 6 as plusher and more comfortable than the Evo SL with a different, softer kind of energy, occupying a different niche in ASICS's range rather than directly rivaling the Evo SL.

    Ride:Much softer, plusher, more cushioned and bouncier than the Evo SL, with a different comfort-first energy; the v6 was noted as faster than the v5 thanks to its FF Turbo squared forefoot unit, but still not as aggressive or high-rocker as the Evo SL.

    In their words: "easy super comfort" · "far more much more comfortable shoe"

    — The Run Testers , source
  • One of the reviewer's top shoes of the year — soft, forgiving, and durable enough for constant daily use across walking, work, and running.

    In their words: "one of the best versions recently"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • A comfortable, versatile daily trainer with a new square-turbo forefoot piece; the reviewer isn't certain it beats the Mizuno Neo Vista for comfort but expects it to please existing Novablast fans.

    Ride:New square-turbo forefoot piece works well with the existing blast foam.

    In their words: "does the basics very well"

    — FORDY RUNS , source
  • A versatile, comfortable daily trainer with a punchier forefoot pod than the previous version, let down slightly by short laces and some quality-control issues (glue marks).

    Ride:FF Blast Max with a poppier, more responsive FF Turbo Squared forefoot pod than the previous version; a very smooth ride best felt by mid/forefoot strikers.

    Fit:Breathable upper with lots of heel padding; laces run oddly short.

    In their words: "really extremely versatile" · "a very smooth riding shoe"

    — Ben Parkes , source

New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • The Run Testers find the Rebel v5 a comfort-oriented, softer trainer well suited to long, easy-paced or ultra-distance efforts, but it lacks the performance edge of the Evo SL and is not considered a killer.

    Ride:Described as much softer and more comfort-driven than a more aggressive sibling model in the Rebel line; one reviewer used it for ultra-distance efforts (a Comrades-length run and part of a 100-mile race), saying the more aggressive sibling was too unforgiving for that. Criticised by the reviewers for being a little too soft and lacking the performance edge of that faster sibling shoe.

    In their words: "much more kind of comfort driven" · "really easy sort of click along"

    — The Run Testers , source
  • Kofuzi calls the FuelCell Rebel v5 one of his favorite daily trainers on the market, offering a soft, relaxed, generously-fitting ride from its plateless PEA-blend FuelCell foam.

    Ride:Softer and more relaxed at all paces than the SC Rebel, especially for forefoot strikers, while still bouncy thanks to the PEA-blend FuelCell foam

    Fit:Fits very generously, especially compared to the more racer-fit SC Rebel

    In their words: "one of my favorite daily trainers" · "a lot more relaxed"

    — Kofuzi , source
  • The FuelCell Rebel v5 is the comfort winner of this group with its softer, less responsive ride, but it falls short as a performance option; the reviewer considers it more of a comfortable daily trainer than a true performance shoe.

    Ride:Softest shoe of the group; least responsive due to slow-rebounding FuelCell foam; tallest feeling of the group despite similar stack to others; comfortable for long runs; wider platform adds inherent stability; best walking shoe of the group

    Fit:Not too narrow performance fit, not too wide or baggy; upper is just right — light mesh, comfortable

    In their words: "the softest Rebel by far" · "not the fastest, but definitely one of the most comfortable" · "the comfort like winner of this group, but not necessarily the performance one"

    — Doctors of Running , 45 mi tested , source
  • A great reviewed shoe, though the reviewer personally can't get the fit dialed in for their foot, landing it at A-tier rather than S.

    In their words: "we did get a great review this year" · "I still feel like I can't get the fit dialed in"

    — Believe in the Run , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the ASICS Novablast 6 if

  • A do-it-all daily trainer suited to a wide range of runners and running styles, with enough pep for some speed work. — Ben Parkes
  • Everyday training that can also handle speedwork and racing (5K up through marathon-day speed), especially for runners with wider, deeper feet. — Run Moore
  • Runners wanting a versatile daily trainer that handles easy miles through tempo workouts, offering more bounce and responsiveness than typical cushioned trainers — The Run Testers
  • Versatile daily training for beginners through experienced runners who want a cushioned cruiser with enough pop for tempo work. — The Run Testers
  • Budget-minded runners wanting a fun, versatile, high-value daily trainer that can log lots of miles. — Believe in the Run
  • An everyday trainer versatile enough for easy days, faster efforts, and racing. — Run Moore

Consider the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5 if

  • Primary daily trainer — replaces cushier shoes in rotation — The Run Testers
  • Versatile lightweight trainer skewing toward tempo, long runs, and workouts, though capable across easy paces and races — Doctors of Running
  • Runners who want a softer, bouncier lightweight trainer with more secure lockdown — Doctors of Running
  • Daily training, recovery, and long runs that can also handle fartleks, threshold work, and marathon-effort long runs — Kofuzi
  • Lightweight daily trainer for easy-to-tempo miles and runners who want a versatile shoe with a bit more pop. — The Run Testers
  • Runners who prioritize plush comfort and softness over responsiveness for easy runs and long slow distance — Doctors of Running

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the ASICS Novablast 6 and the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5?

The ASICS Novablast 6 is a daily trainer and the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5 is a daily trainer. By the numbers, the ASICS Novablast 6 weighs 249g, has a 42mm heel stack and an 8mm drop, while the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5 weighs 224g, has a 38mm heel stack and a 6mm drop. MSRP is $155 for the ASICS Novablast 6 and $145 for the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5.

Should I buy the ASICS Novablast 6 or the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5?

Ben Parkes on the ASICS Novablast 6: A do-it-all daily trainer suited to a wide range of runners and running styles, with enough pep for some speed work. The Run Testers on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5: Primary daily trainer — replaces cushier shoes in rotation.

Per Ben Parkes, The Run Testers.

Has anyone reviewed both the ASICS Novablast 6 and the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5?

Yes — The Run Testers, Kofuzi, Believe in the Run, and EDDBUD directly compared the ASICS Novablast 6 and the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5 in their reviews.

Per The Run Testers, Kofuzi, Believe in the Run, EDDBUD.

Which is lighter, the ASICS Novablast 6 or the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5?

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5 is lighter, at 224g versus 249g (men's 9) — about 25g less.

Which is more cushioned, the ASICS Novablast 6 or the New Balance FuelCell Rebel 5?

Measured by stack height, the ASICS Novablast 6 has more underfoot foam — 42mm at the heel versus 38mm.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.