ASICS Superblast 3
ASICS

Superblast 3

Daily trainer · FF Leap · no plate

Open shoe page
HOKA Skyward X
HOKA

Skyward X

Long run · PEBA foam top layer + supercritical EVA · carbon plate

Open shoe page

ASICS Superblast 3 vs HOKA Skyward X

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 6 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 6
Ben Parkes, FORDY RUNS, The Run Testers, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

46 / 38 mm heel / forefoot
Stack
49 / 44 mm +6mm forefoot
8 mm
Drop
5 mm 3mm lower
8.1 oz 230 g · −76 g
Weight
10.8 oz 306 g
FF Leap (A-TPU) top + FF Blast Plus (EVA/OBC bio-based blend) base
Midsole
PEBA foam top layer + supercritical EVA (SCF EVA) frame base
None
Plate
curved carbon fiber plate
Recycled polyester mesh
Upper
recycled polyester flat knit with molded heel counter and ghillie lacing
$210 $15 less
MSRP
$225

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Superblast 3 is softer/less stable; Skyward X 2 is more rockered and stable

— Doctors of Running on the ASICS Superblast 3, source

Superblast is ~70g lighter, more breathable, more versatile, more forgiving foam without the plate; Ed picks the Superblast over Skyward X if he could only have one.

— EDDBUD on the HOKA Skyward X, source

Reviewer rejects the framing that Skyward X competes with Superblast — Skyward X is not a versatile fast cruiser.

— Kofuzi on the HOKA Skyward X, source

Superblast 2 is much lighter, more breathable, more versatile and runner-driven; Skyward X is heavier and more 'controlling' via its carbon plate rocker — Ed prefers the Superblast 2 for almost everything.

— EDDBUD on the HOKA Skyward X, source

Similar overall stack height but Superblast doesn't feel as tall walking around as the Skyward X does.

— Ben Parkes on the HOKA Skyward X, source

ASICS Superblast 3 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: maximal cushion , soft_plush feel , high energy return , neutral stability , moderate rocker.

  • One of the best long-run shoes on the market thanks to its soft FF Blast foam and great lockdown, though this version's outsole durability is a step down from the Superblast 2.

    Ride:Super soft, lightweight, and comfortable for 20K-30K long runs; can feel a little unstable at faster paces/tight corners.

    In their words: "amazing for those long runs" · "a real shame about the durability"

    — Ben Parkes , source
  • A soft, comfortable shoe Fordy still takes out for 12-15 mile runs, but which he doesn't consider suited to his very longest long-run mileage.

    Ride:Soft, cushioned ride; comfortable for mid-length runs but not rated for his very longest miles.

    In their words: "if you like a soft shoe"

    — FORDY RUNS , source
  • An impressively light max-cushion trainer that shines on long, steady marathon-pace efforts, but several testers found it softer and 'mushier' than expected, less specialized than the Superblast 2, and not clearly worth its higher price over the Novablast 6.

    Ride:Softer, more compressive, and more consistent underfoot than the Novablast 6 thanks to the full-length FF Leap top layer, giving a smooth heel-to-toe roll well suited to marathon-pace long runs — but a couple of testers found it 'mushy' at slower paces and less versatile for faster work than the previous Superblast 2.

    Fit:True to size with a roomy toe box, though slightly less heel-collar padding than the Novablast 6.

    In their words: "much softer, more compressive, more highly cushioned" · "a little bit mushy" · "lost some of its upper pace edge"

    — The Run Testers , 40 mi tested , source
  • Kofuzi calls the Superblast 3 one of the best shoes in its class -- lighter than the Neo Vista 3, capable of both daily training and picking up the pace -- and says it's his preferred option overall despite the $210 price.

    Ride:Squishier, airier, bouncier FF Blast top foam evened out by a firmer daily-training bottom layer; noticeably lighter than the Neo Vista 3 and better at picking up the pace.

    In their words: "one of the best in its class" · "relatively feather weight"

    — Kofuzi , source

HOKA Skyward X — what reviewers say

Ride profile: maximal cushion , neutral stability .

  • Retrospective: a comfortable cushioned shoe that was too big, too heavy, and too expensive to earn a regular slot in his rotation.

    Ride:Comfortable and bouncy in retrospective wear-test, but heavy and clunky enough that Nick never made it a rotation mainstay; even on easy days it felt like 'a lot of shoe' under foot.

    — The Run Testers , source
  • The biggest, most extreme stack on the list — bulky but really fun, with a plate that lets it pick up the pace better than the other max-stack shoes; a fan favorite of his channel.

    Ride:Massive 48mm stack with soft squishy PEBA + supercritical EVA, but the carbon plate adds enough stiffness to keep it stable and bouncy at marathon and half-marathon paces, unlike the squishier-only options on this list. Heaviest shoe Ben has ever tested.

    Fit:True to size with good lockdown.

    — Ben Parkes , source
  • A genuine love-hate relationship after 266 miles and a marathon — Steve calls it one of his top 2-3 favorites of 2024 for effortless long miles, but the narrow stiff toe box hurts his feet and the outsole has worn faster than peers at the price point.

    Ride:Effortless protection — bounces along on PEBA + EVA + carbon plate without ever feeling the ground. Stiff through the toe box. Best go-to when legs are already beat up. Outsole has worn down faster than competitors at the same mileage on similar terrain.

    Fit:Stiff narrow toe box that aggravates bunions and width-sensitive feet — gets slightly wider with break-in but never fully resolves; foot soreness later in the day is a regular tradeoff. Hip wear-and-tear noted from Steve's tendency to supinate in this shoe.

    — Run Moore , 266 mi tested , source
  • An expensive luxury cushion shoe that Ed sold on — the foam is good but the heft makes it strictly a recovery-day option, and even there he prefers the lighter Superblast 2.

    Ride:Cushion is nice but the carbon plate dictates a heel-to-toe rocker rather than letting the runner drive the shoe. The 5mm drop felt like an attempt to stabilize a very tall stack — Ed thinks 8mm with less midfoot foam would have made the shoe more aggressive. Far too heavy for him as a lighter-framed runner — strictly a recovery option in his rotation.

    Fit:Plush, padded tongue and heel collar; similar forefoot/heel widths to the Superblast 2.

    — EDDBUD , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the ASICS Superblast 3 if

  • Runners finding the Megablast too firm — FORDY RUNS
  • Long-range daily miles with a bouncier, more fun ride than v2 — EDDBUD
  • Leisurely midweek miles replacing the role of the Vomero Premium — FORDY RUNS
  • Marathon racing alternative for runners who can't gel with carbon-plated super shoes — the lightest of this super-trainer group — Doctors of Running
  • Long runs and recovery runs for high-mileage runners needing leg protection — Ben Is Running
  • Runners wanting a max-cushion shoe that also handles daily training, picking up the pace, and works as a non-plated race-day option. — Kofuzi

Consider the HOKA Skyward X if

  • Half/full marathon training when leg protection is the priority — recovery runs and long runs. — EDDBUD
  • Marathoners or road-ultra runners who want maximum cushion for long-distance training and racing. — Doctors of Running
  • Heavier runners or runners who want max-stack cushion that scales up to half/marathon racing thanks to the plate. — Ben Parkes
  • Slow recovery and long-mileage time-on-feet days for runners getting ready for ultra-distance or marathon-distance races. — Run Moore
  • Runners who want a tall, plush, controlled cushioned shoe for easy and long runs. — Kofuzi
  • Pure long runs and cushy easy runs only — not a versatile trainer. — The Run Testers

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the ASICS Superblast 3 and the HOKA Skyward X?

The ASICS Superblast 3 is a daily trainer and the HOKA Skyward X is a long run. By the numbers, the ASICS Superblast 3 weighs 230g, has a 46mm heel stack and an 8mm drop, while the HOKA Skyward X weighs 306g, has a 49mm heel stack and a 5mm drop. The HOKA Skyward X has a curved carbon fiber plate; the ASICS Superblast 3 has none. MSRP is $210 for the ASICS Superblast 3 and $225 for the HOKA Skyward X.

Should I buy the ASICS Superblast 3 or the HOKA Skyward X?

FORDY RUNS on the ASICS Superblast 3: Runners finding the Megablast too firm. EDDBUD on the HOKA Skyward X: Half/full marathon training when leg protection is the priority — recovery runs and long runs.

Per FORDY RUNS, EDDBUD.

Has anyone reviewed both the ASICS Superblast 3 and the HOKA Skyward X?

Yes — Doctors of Running, EDDBUD, Kofuzi, and Ben Parkes directly compared the ASICS Superblast 3 and the HOKA Skyward X in their reviews.

Per Doctors of Running, EDDBUD, Kofuzi, Ben Parkes.

Which is lighter, the ASICS Superblast 3 or the HOKA Skyward X?

The ASICS Superblast 3 is lighter, at 230g versus 306g (men's 9) — about 76g less.

Which is more cushioned, the ASICS Superblast 3 or the HOKA Skyward X?

Measured by stack height, the HOKA Skyward X has more underfoot foam — 49mm at the heel versus 46mm.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.