HOKA Bondi 9
HOKA

Bondi 9

Recovery / easy · Supercritical EVA · no plate

Open shoe page
Brooks Glycerin Max 2
Brooks

Glycerin Max 2

Recovery / easy · DNA TUNED · no plate

Open shoe page

HOKA Bondi 9 vs Brooks Glycerin Max 2

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 7 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 7
Kofuzi, Seth James DeMoor, The Run Testers, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

44 / 39 mm heel / forefoot
Stack
48 / 42 mm +3mm forefoot
5 mm
Drop
6 mm
10.8 oz 306 g · −9 g
Weight
11.1 oz 315 g
Supercritical EVA
Midsole
DNA TUNED nitrogen-infused EVA, dual-size cells
None
Plate
None
Warp knit jacquard (55% recycled polyester)
Upper
Triple jacquard air mesh
$175 $25 less
MSRP
$200

The consensus read

Each paragraph is a synthesis across every reviewer in our database for that shoe — what they collectively concluded after wear-testing. Not a quote. Not one person's take. The shape of the room.

HOKA Bondi 9

A modernized max-cushion trainer that trades the Bondi's traditional firmness for a softer, bouncier ride via supercritical EVA, making it genuinely runnable for easy and recovery days while retaining its signature stability—though some testers flag a blockier toe-off feel compared to lighter racers.

Brooks Glycerin Max 2

A max-cushion trainer built for easy miles and recovery, the Glycerin Max 2 delivers consistent protection with a pronounced rocker but feels heavier and less dynamic than its predecessor, leaving some testers questioning its value at $200.

HOKA Bondi 9 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: maximal cushion , neutral stability .

  • An excellent max cushion shoe that nails the balance between cushion and bounce without feeling mushy.

    Ride:Max cushioned with a little bit of bounciness — doesn't feel tall for the sake of being tall and isn't mushy. A fantastic update.

    In their words: "a little bit of bounciness" · "they got it just right with the Bondi" · "excellent example of a max cushion shoe"

    — Kofuzi , source
  • A genuine surprise: the updated midsole makes the Bondi 9 feel meaningfully better than prior Bondis, and he'd pick it over the Vomero 18.

    Ride:Feels noticeably better under step than prior Bondis thanks to updated EVA midsole; softer and more cushioned, and under 10 oz in his size which is very good for a maximalist daily trainer.

    Fit:Snug through the midfoot — maybe a touch too snug — and a smidge in the toe box; consider a half size up for wider feet. Love the heel pocket and counter; tongue could be a bit more plush.

    In their words: "felt snug through the midfoot" · "Maybe a half size up" · "felt so much better under step"

    — Seth James DeMoor , 50 mi tested , source
  • A reliable max-cushion cruiser with soft heel and strong natural stability, but a blocky feel and sticky toe-off make it less versatile than the Gel-Nimbus 27 at any pace.

    Ride:Softer feel at the heel with a nice bevel, but forefoot rocker can feel a bit stuck/ponderous at toe-off. Super-critical EVA is comfort-focused, not lively; very wide base for natural stability.

    Fit:Stick to normal size; a bit narrower than the Gel-Nimbus 27 but not a narrow Hoka overall — wide versions available. Cradles Achilles nicely without aggression; plenty of padding.

    In their words: "a bit ponderous" · "a bit cushier" · "really nice heel bevel design"

    — The Run Testers , 36 mi tested , source
  • A well-updated Bondi that finally modernizes into a bouncier, much more runnable max-cushion option thanks to the super critical EVA, best suited to neutral runners.

    Ride:Much more runnable than the Gaviota with noticeable bounce from the super critical EVA; feels lighter than its listed 12 oz; heavier than ideal for a high-cushion runnable shoe but still springy; neutral platform can let some runners drift onto the outside of the foot

    Fit:Reviewer notes Bondi 9 is available in 4E width for men and 2E for women; a men's 2E Bondi fits roughly like a 4E in other shoes

    In their words: "much more runnable" · "much more bounce" · "heavier than it probably wants to be"

    — Run Moore , source

Brooks Glycerin Max 2 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: maximal cushion , soft_plush feel , neutral stability .

  • A solid max-cushion option but heavier and less fun than the Vomero Plus; Nick also prefers the original Glycerin Max over this update.

    Ride:Consistent poppy ride with a firmer, more stable feel than ZoomX; the Glide Roll rocker and lower 6mm drop give a smooth turnover but limited toe-off bounce, and the shoe feels labored at faster paces.

    Fit:True to size in UK 9 / US 10; stiff internal heel counter is noticeable but not a problem on the run; comfortable padded upper with a slightly thinner, more breathable forefoot than the Nike.

    In their words: "very nice consistent poppy ride" · "more stable than Zumax" · "a bit labored"

    — The Run Testers , 31 mi tested , source
  • A denser, heavier Glycerin Max that is locked into the easy recovery niche; the reviewer clearly prefers the lighter Nimbus 28 at a similar price.

    Ride:Denser foam than v1, still soft and forgiving but not quicksand-like; aggressive outsole with more rubber coverage especially in the heel; ~314g feels bottom-heavy on foot; slightly lower drop than Nimbus

    In their words: "a much heavier shoe on foot" · "a much denser foam" · "feels quite bottomheavy"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • A disappointing update that strips the original's dynamic bounce and personality, leaving a forgettable, heavy max-cushion shoe that's hard to justify at $200.

    Ride:Very pronounced rocker, but foam feels blocky and lost the squish/bounce dynamism of v1.

    Fit:Plush padded upper, slightly narrower forefoot than v1, fits true to size.

    In their words: "rocker is the most pronounced characteristic" · "more narrow than the last version" · "doesn't feel that soft or max cushion"

    — Believe in the Run , source
  • A meaningful improvement over the original Glycerin Max for runners who prefer a firmer, more structured ride; the sharp forefoot rocker masks the weight and feels great on long runs, though the heel transition may not suit everyone.

    Ride:High stack rockered ride with slightly firmer DNA Tuned foam than v1; sharp forefoot rocker creates rhythmic roll, heel feels structured and can be slightly slappy/clunky through the midfoot transition. Outsole grips very well.

    Fit:Normal width throughout, plush triple jacquard mesh upper, breathable but may run warm in summer; normal forefoot volume with adequate toe space.

    In their words: "max stack training shoe" · "very rockered" · "heel might be a touch clunky"

    — Doctors of Running , 5 mi tested , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the HOKA Bondi 9 if

  • Runners wanting a plush, stable max-cushion neutral trainer for easy miles — Doctors of Running
  • Maximalist daily training and comfort-focused runners, including those who loved prior Bondis — Seth James DeMoor
  • Max stack easy-day running and lifestyle/walking wear for people who love the classic Bondi feel — Believe in the Run
  • Max cushion easy and recovery days — Kofuzi
  • Easy day and recovery runs, walking, and travel; a plush max cushion comfort shoe — Believe in the Run
  • Runners wanting a tall-stack, stable, cushioned shoe for easy and recovery days, or people who found previous Bondis too firm — Kofuzi

Consider the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 if

  • Runners who want a very stable, natural-feeling max-cushion shoe for racking up easy miles and long runs. — The Run Testers
  • Easy/recovery running where weight is not a priority — EDDBUD
  • Max cushion easy miles for runners who prioritize rocker over bounce. — Believe in the Run
  • Walking and short easy efforts for runners who specifically want a very tall, very cushioned shoe — The Run Testers
  • Heavier runners and grueling marathon training blocks needing leg protection — EDDBUD
  • Neutral runners wanting a protective max-stack trainer with a pronounced forefoot rocker for longer efforts — Doctors of Running

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the HOKA Bondi 9 and the Brooks Glycerin Max 2?

The HOKA Bondi 9 is a recovery / easy and the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is a recovery / easy. By the numbers, the HOKA Bondi 9 weighs 306g, has a 44mm heel stack and a 5mm drop, while the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 weighs 315g, has a 48mm heel stack and a 6mm drop. MSRP is $175 for the HOKA Bondi 9 and $200 for the Brooks Glycerin Max 2.

Should I buy the HOKA Bondi 9 or the Brooks Glycerin Max 2?

Doctors of Running on the HOKA Bondi 9: Runners wanting a plush, stable max-cushion neutral trainer for easy miles. The Run Testers on the Brooks Glycerin Max 2: Runners who want a very stable, natural-feeling max-cushion shoe for racking up easy miles and long runs.

Per Doctors of Running, The Run Testers.

Which is lighter, the HOKA Bondi 9 or the Brooks Glycerin Max 2?

The HOKA Bondi 9 is lighter, at 306g versus 315g (men's 9) — about 9g less.

Which is more cushioned, the HOKA Bondi 9 or the Brooks Glycerin Max 2?

Measured by stack height, the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 has more underfoot foam — 48mm at the heel versus 44mm.

Which is cheaper, the HOKA Bondi 9 or the Brooks Glycerin Max 2?

The HOKA Bondi 9 is cheaper at $175 versus $200 MSRP — about $25 less.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.