HOKA Bondi v9 vs Brooks Glycerin Max v2
A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 7 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.
Specs at a glance
| HOKA Bondi v9 | Brooks Glycerin Max v2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Stack (heel / forefoot) | 44.0 / 39.0 mm | 48.0 / 42.0 mm |
| Drop | 5.0 mm | 6.0 mm |
| Weight (men's 9) | 10.8 oz (306g) | 11.1 oz (315g) |
| Midsole | Supercritical EVA | DNA TUNED (nitrogen-infused EVA, dual-size cells) |
| Plate | — | none |
| Upper | Warp knit jacquard (55% recycled polyester) | Triple jacquard air mesh |
| MSRP | $175.00 | $200.00 |
The consensus read
Each paragraph is a synthesis across every reviewer in our database for that shoe — what they collectively concluded after wear-testing. Not a quote. Not one person's take. The shape of the room.
HOKA Bondi v9
A modernized max-cushion trainer that trades its previous firmness for a softer, bouncier ride via super-critical EVA, making it genuinely runnable for easy days and recovery. Most testers praise the upgrade, though some note it still feels firmer underfoot than its plush step-in suggests, and a half-size bump is often recommended.
Brooks Glycerin Max v2
A max-cushion trainer built for easy miles and recovery, the Glycerin Max 2 delivers consistent protection with a pronounced rocker but feels heavier and less dynamic than its predecessor, leaving some testers questioning its value at $200.
HOKA Bondi v9 — what reviewers say
Ride profile: maximal cushion , neutral stability .
-
An excellent max cushion shoe that nails the balance between cushion and bounce without feeling mushy.
Ride:Max cushioned with a little bit of bounciness — doesn't feel tall for the sake of being tall and isn't mushy. A fantastic update.
In their words: "a little bit of bounciness" · "they got it just right with the Bondi" · "excellent example of a max cushion shoe"
-
A genuine surprise: the updated midsole makes the Bondi 9 feel meaningfully better than prior Bondis, and he'd pick it over the Vomero 18.
Ride:Feels noticeably better under step than prior Bondis thanks to updated EVA midsole; softer and more cushioned, and under 10 oz in his size which is very good for a maximalist daily trainer.
Fit:Snug through the midfoot — maybe a touch too snug — and a smidge in the toe box; consider a half size up for wider feet. Love the heel pocket and counter; tongue could be a bit more plush.
In their words: "felt snug through the midfoot" · "Maybe a half size up" · "felt so much better under step"
-
A reliable max-cushion cruiser with soft heel and strong natural stability, but a blocky feel and sticky toe-off make it less versatile than the Gel-Nimbus 27 at any pace.
Ride:Softer feel at the heel with a nice bevel, but forefoot rocker can feel a bit stuck/ponderous at toe-off. Super-critical EVA is comfort-focused, not lively; very wide base for natural stability.
Fit:Stick to normal size; a bit narrower than the Gel-Nimbus 27 but not a narrow Hoka overall — wide versions available. Cradles Achilles nicely without aggression; plenty of padding.
In their words: "a bit ponderous" · "a bit cushier" · "really nice heel bevel design"
-
A well-updated Bondi that finally modernizes into a bouncier, much more runnable max-cushion option thanks to the super critical EVA, best suited to neutral runners.
Ride:Much more runnable than the Gaviota with noticeable bounce from the super critical EVA; feels lighter than its listed 12 oz; heavier than ideal for a high-cushion runnable shoe but still springy; neutral platform can let some runners drift onto the outside of the foot
Fit:Reviewer notes Bondi 9 is available in 4E width for men and 2E for women; a men's 2E Bondi fits roughly like a 4E in other shoes
In their words: "much more runnable" · "much more bounce" · "heavier than it probably wants to be"
Brooks Glycerin Max v2 — what reviewers say
Ride profile: maximal cushion , soft_plush feel , neutral stability .
-
A solid max-cushion option but heavier and less fun than the Vomero Plus; Nick also prefers the original Glycerin Max over this update.
Ride:Consistent poppy ride with a firmer, more stable feel than ZoomX; the Glide Roll rocker and lower 6mm drop give a smooth turnover but limited toe-off bounce, and the shoe feels labored at faster paces.
Fit:True to size in UK 9 / US 10; stiff internal heel counter is noticeable but not a problem on the run; comfortable padded upper with a slightly thinner, more breathable forefoot than the Nike.
In their words: "very nice consistent poppy ride" · "more stable than Zumax" · "a bit labored"
-
A denser, heavier Glycerin Max that is locked into the easy recovery niche; the reviewer clearly prefers the lighter Nimbus 28 at a similar price.
Ride:Denser foam than v1, still soft and forgiving but not quicksand-like; aggressive outsole with more rubber coverage especially in the heel; ~314g feels bottom-heavy on foot; slightly lower drop than Nimbus
In their words: "a much heavier shoe on foot" · "a much denser foam" · "feels quite bottomheavy"
-
A disappointing update that strips the original's dynamic bounce and personality, leaving a forgettable, heavy max-cushion shoe that's hard to justify at $200.
Ride:Very pronounced rocker, but foam feels blocky and lost the squish/bounce dynamism of v1.
Fit:Plush padded upper, slightly narrower forefoot than v1, fits true to size.
In their words: "rocker is the most pronounced characteristic" · "more narrow than the last version" · "doesn't feel that soft or max cushion"
-
A meaningful improvement over the original Glycerin Max for runners who prefer a firmer, more structured ride; the sharp forefoot rocker masks the weight and feels great on long runs, though the heel transition may not suit everyone.
Ride:High stack rockered ride with slightly firmer DNA Tuned foam than v1; sharp forefoot rocker creates rhythmic roll, heel feels structured and can be slightly slappy/clunky through the midfoot transition. Outsole grips very well.
Fit:Normal width throughout, plush triple jacquard mesh upper, breathable but may run warm in summer; normal forefoot volume with adequate toe space.
In their words: "max stack training shoe" · "very rockered" · "heel might be a touch clunky"
Who should buy which
Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.
Consider the HOKA Bondi v9 if
- Runners wanting a plush, stable max-cushion neutral trainer for easy miles — Doctors of Running
- Recovery runs, easy runs, and general daily training where comfort and cushion are prioritized over pace — Kofuzi
- Maximalist daily training and comfort-focused runners, including those who loved prior Bondis — Seth James DeMoor
- Max stack easy-day running and lifestyle/walking wear for people who love the classic Bondi feel — Believe in the Run
- Max cushion easy and recovery days — Kofuzi
- Easy day and recovery runs, walking, and travel; a plush max cushion comfort shoe — Believe in the Run
Consider the Brooks Glycerin Max v2 if
- Runners who want a very stable, natural-feeling max-cushion shoe for racking up easy miles and long runs. — The Run Testers
- Easy/recovery running where weight is not a priority — EDDBUD
- Max cushion easy miles for runners who prioritize rocker over bounce. — Believe in the Run
- Walking and short easy efforts for runners who specifically want a very tall, very cushioned shoe — The Run Testers
- Heavier runners and grueling marathon training blocks needing leg protection — EDDBUD
- Neutral runners wanting a protective max-stack trainer with a pronounced forefoot rocker for longer efforts — Doctors of Running