New Balance SC Elite 5
New Balance

SC Elite 5

Race shoe · FuelCell 100% PEBA superfoam · carbon plate

Open shoe page
New Balance SC Elite 6
New Balance

SC Elite 6

Race shoe · Infinion · carbon plate

Open shoe page

New Balance SC Elite 5 vs New Balance SC Elite 6

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 6 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 6
EDDBUD, FORDY RUNS, Doctors of Running, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

40 / 32 mm heel / forefoot
Stack
39 / 31 mm heel / forefoot
8 mm
Drop
8 mm
7.1 oz 201 g
Weight
6.5 oz 184 g · −17 g
FuelCell 100% PEBA superfoam
Midsole
Infinion PEBA blend
Full-length carbon fiber plate
Plate
Energy Arc carbon fiber plate, variable thickness thinner at heel, denser at toe
Engineered mesh
Upper
Hyper-translucent engineered mesh with FANTOMFIT
$265 $10 less
MSRP
$275

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Firmer, more stable, and better suited to long runs; the v6 is far lighter, softer, and faster but less stable in the heel and midfoot

— Doctors of Running on the New Balance SC Elite 5, source

The 5's forefoot rocker was muted and the midsole felt flat by comparison; the 6 is a clear step up in liveliness

— Doctors of Running on the New Balance SC Elite 6, source

V6 uses InfinionON ATPU foam vs v5's PEBA compound; feels more racy and lower to the ground

— FORDY RUNS on the New Balance SC Elite 6, source

Much lighter, softer, bouncier, and faster, but less stable in the heel and midfoot than the firmer, more structured v5

— Doctors of Running on the New Balance SC Elite 6, source

The Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 4 comparison fits the outgoing V5 better than the V6, since the V6 now has more energy return and bounce.

— The Run Testers on the New Balance SC Elite 6, source

Same stack height, drop and plate position; v5 uses a PEBA foam and a toothier outsole vs v6's Infinion foam and slicker outsole, and is now discounted to $200 vs v6's $275

— Kofuzi on the New Balance SC Elite 6, source

The new InfiniCoil midsole has more bounce and durability than the previous FuelCell-based midsole

— Doctors of Running on the New Balance SC Elite 6, source

A significant step up from the V5, now more comparable to the top race shoes on the market

— The Run Testers on the New Balance SC Elite 6, source

New Balance SC Elite 5 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • A firm, dense, narrow racer that may suit shorter-strided runners with a faster cadence, but has been slept on due to price. Tier D.

    In their words: "a lot more firm, I guess, and dense" · "narrow surface area may well cause some issues"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • FORDY ran a 3:28 marathon PB in the SC Elite 5 at London — a stable, competent, hot-spot-free marathon shoe, well worth buying at a discount before version 6 replaces it.

    In their words: "it was brilliant" · "a very capable, competent marathon shoe"

    — FORDY RUNS , source
  • The SC Elite v5 remains a stable, comfortable trainer-racer with a wide, secure upper — the more versatile choice for long runs and cruising paces, though its stiff plate and heel counter take some breaking in.

    Ride:Firmer FuelCell PEBA midsole with a laterally-biased forefoot rocker gives a stable, consistent ride that transitions more slowly — ideal for cruising long runs

    Fit:Higher-volume, wider fit with a wide option available; a very comfortable gusseted upper, though the heel counter is on the stiffer side

    In their words: "weirdly stable and very comfortable" · "trainer racer vibe" · "so comfortable"

    — Doctors of Running , 120 mi tested , source
  • Megan's pick over the Cielo X1 2.0 in bracket round 2 — performance is comparable.

    Ride:Megan has run 2-3 marathons in it and felt great the whole time.

    — Believe in the Run , source

New Balance SC Elite 6 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • The reviewer rated the SC Elite v6's performance on par with the Hyperion Elite 6 after a hilly 20-mile long run and said he'd happily race a marathon in it, but flags that the silicone heel pads caused rubbing with thin socks.

    Ride:Performed well across a hillier 20-mile long run with some goal-pace segments; the reviewer felt it had more left in the tank at pace. Stable for a big-stack racer with a non-aggressive carbon plate.

    Fit:Tested in a UK 10; also available in a wide fit. Lockdown is good, though the reviewer preferred the Brooks' sawtooth laces. The silicone heel pads rubbed badly and tore up his heel when worn with thin socks — he suspects sock choice was a factor.

    In their words: "wanted me to go faster" · "ripped my heel to pieces" · "moved away from PEBA"

    — FORDY RUNS , 20 mi tested , source
  • Parkes sees the SC Elite v6 as a genuine foam and plate upgrade over v5 that stays comfortable and true to New Balance's accommodating race-shoe formula, but a thin, durability-worrying outsole, rear-foot instability and a lack of top-tier snap left him underwhelmed — he'd point most regular runners to the cheaper SC Rebel instead.

    Ride:New Infiniam foam and a reworked, stiffer Energy Arc plate make it livelier and more natural-feeling than v5, but the rear of the shoe feels unstable and it lacks the pronounced rocker and snap of top rivals.

    Fit:Runs slightly small; recommends half a size up for a regular fit, or true to size for a snug race fit. Midfoot runs narrower than v5. Still offered in a 2E wide fit, unique in the super shoe category. Lockdown was spot-on with no rubbing, chafing or heel slip.

    In their words: "going on the sale pile" · "very underwhelmed by this one" · "lockdown was spot-on"

    — Ben Parkes , source
  • Both testers agree it's New Balance's best super shoe to date, calling it a clear step up in fit and midsole feel over the SC Elite 3-5 line, even if it isn't either tester's overall top race pick.

    Ride:The plate doesn't fully contact the upper midsole layer, which both testers think contributes to a distinctively light, bouncy, resilient feel usable from 5K pace up to easy runs.

    Fit:Nice wide toe box without feeling sloppy.

    In their words: "checks all the boxes" · "light, bouncy, not too soft"

    — Doctors of Running , source
  • A strong, dependable step up from the V5 with a livelier Infinitum foam and carbon plate combo, but stops short of the very top-tier carbon racers.

    Ride:Smooth, controlled energy return that favors marathon/half-marathon pace over 5K snap, with more compression and spring when landing further back in the shoe.

    Fit:Runs slightly narrow through the midfoot; multiple testers recommend going up half a size, especially for marathon-distance racing.

    In their words: "it feels poppier" · "it feels quicker" · "a good, solid step up over the V5"

    — The Run Testers , 43 mi tested , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the New Balance SC Elite 5 if

  • Long runs and trainer-racer versatility for runners who want a stable, comfortable super shoe — Doctors of Running
  • Everyday marathoners wanting stability, wide-foot runners, balanced race day pick — FORDY RUNS
  • PB attempts and fast-paced racing for runners who want an aggressive carbon plate shoe that is still stable — The Run Testers
  • Marathon racing — FORDY RUNS
  • Runners who want a versatile carbon race shoe that mixes softness and speed across 5K to marathon distances, with road protection over the long haul — The Run Testers
  • Runners who like trampoline-like midsole cutouts and traditional upper — EDDBUD

Consider the New Balance SC Elite 6 if

  • General-purpose racing and fast workouts, though neither tester would call it their single favorite super shoe. — Doctors of Running
  • Marathoners wanting a stable, forgiving racing shoe usable across a range of paces. — FORDY RUNS
  • Fast racing over 5K to 10K (potentially further for more stable runners) for those prioritizing speed over stability — Doctors of Running
  • Shorter, faster racing (5K-10K) for runners who want a low, connected race-flat feel over plush marathon cushioning — Believe in the Run
  • Marathoners wanting a well-cushioned carbon racer, provided they're mindful of sock choice around the heel. — FORDY RUNS
  • 10K to half marathon distance racing — The Run Testers

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the New Balance SC Elite 5 and the New Balance SC Elite 6?

The New Balance SC Elite 5 is a race shoe and the New Balance SC Elite 6 is a race shoe. By the numbers, the New Balance SC Elite 5 weighs 201g, has a 40mm heel stack and an 8mm drop, while the New Balance SC Elite 6 weighs 184g, has a 39mm heel stack and an 8mm drop. MSRP is $265 for the New Balance SC Elite 5 and $275 for the New Balance SC Elite 6.

Should I buy the New Balance SC Elite 5 or the New Balance SC Elite 6?

Doctors of Running on the New Balance SC Elite 5: Long runs and trainer-racer versatility for runners who want a stable, comfortable super shoe. Doctors of Running on the New Balance SC Elite 6: General-purpose racing and fast workouts, though neither tester would call it their single favorite super shoe.

Per Doctors of Running.

Has anyone reviewed both the New Balance SC Elite 5 and the New Balance SC Elite 6?

Yes — Doctors of Running, FORDY RUNS, The Run Testers, and Kofuzi directly compared the New Balance SC Elite 5 and the New Balance SC Elite 6 in their reviews.

Per Doctors of Running, FORDY RUNS, The Run Testers, Kofuzi.

Which is lighter, the New Balance SC Elite 5 or the New Balance SC Elite 6?

The New Balance SC Elite 6 is lighter, at 184g versus 201g (men's 9) — about 17g less.

Which is cheaper, the New Balance SC Elite 5 or the New Balance SC Elite 6?

The New Balance SC Elite 5 is cheaper at $265 versus $275 MSRP — about $10 less.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.