Nike Pegasus v42 vs Brooks Ghost v17

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 6 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Specs at a glance

Nike Pegasus v42 Brooks Ghost v17
Stack (heel / forefoot) 38.0 / 28.0 mm 36.0 / 26.0 mm
Drop 10.0 mm 10.0 mm
Weight (men's 9) 10.3 oz (292g) 10.2 oz (289g)
Midsole ReactX (TPE) + full-length Air Zoom unit DNA LOFT v3 (nitrogen-infused EVA)
Plate
Upper Engineered mesh with 3D printing Double jacquard air mesh
MSRP $145.00 $150.00

The consensus read

Each paragraph is a synthesis across every reviewer in our database for that shoe — what they collectively concluded after wear-testing. Not a quote. Not one person's take. The shape of the room.

Nike Pegasus v42

A structured daily trainer that pairs full-length Zoom Air with ReactX foam for a predictable, firm ride—heavier than lighter competitors at the same price, though reviewers praise the improved fit and wider toe box.

Brooks Ghost v17

A refined daily trainer that balances plush cushioning with subtle stability and versatility, the Ghost 17 handles easy miles through marathon pace with a more responsive forefoot and lower drop than its predecessor, though some find it still slightly firm for a true soft ride.

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Listed as an alternative that could cover similar daily runs

— The Run Testers on the Brooks Ghost v17, source

Ghost 17 offers a bit more stack for a similar value proposition.

— EDDBUD on the Brooks Ghost v17, source

Nike Pegasus v42 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: medium cushion , firm_responsive feel , moderate energy return , neutral stability , moderate rocker.

  • A structured, mild-stability daily trainer that's more plush than ever but feels heavy and un-versatile next to lighter PEBA-based competitors at the same price point.

    Ride:Full-length Zoom Air and ReactX give a predictable, structured, denser landing platform; React X holds shape better than foam-only alternatives; higher drop feel than Azura; better on hill work than expected

    Fit:Price £130 (UK); heavier than the other shoes in comparison at 332g (UK 10.5); more padding across top of foot and heel than competitors — feels like a stability option now

    In their words: "more sort of controlled shoe" · "predictable landing platform" · "more present shoe on foot"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • An incremental improvement over the Pegasus 41 with a new full-length Air Zoom unit and wider toe box, but the dead ReactX foam and 311g weight leave it outclassed by competitors in the same price range.

    Ride:Improved forefoot feel vs the Pegasus 41 thanks to increased toe spring and a full-length curved Air Zoom unit acting like a plate, but the ReactX foam is lifeless and heavy

    Fit:True to size with a wider toe box than the previous version, providing inherent stability

    In their words: "the ReactX foam in here is boring" · "too heavy for a daily trainer" · "more width in this toe box"

    — FORDY RUNS , source
  • A solid, well-executed update that the reviewer considers one of the better-looking and more enjoyable Pegasus iterations in years, though its firmer, one-trick-pony ride keeps it from being truly exciting.

    Ride:React X foam paired with a full-length curved Zoom Air unit that acts like an air plate, noticeably returning energy through the stride; leans firmer but feels light and lively with a cushioned forefoot sensation.

    Fit:True to size in size 10.5; dialed-in fit with comfortable tongue thickness, good heel counter and collar; slightly opened toe box versus prior versions.

    In their words: "Feels light on the foot" · "a little bit on the firmer side" · "a onetrick pony"

    — Believe in the Run , source

Brooks Ghost v17 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: medium cushion , neutral stability .

  • The best Ghost Kofuzi has tried since the Ghost Max 1 — a welcome update with a more modern 10mm drop, softer-feeling DNA Loft v3, and helpful flex grooves, though still slightly firm and annoyingly bumped to $150.

    Ride:New DNA Loft v3 feels softer than last year's version but still a touch firm for a daily trainer. Stable, predictable, good roll-off. Flex grooves make an otherwise plank-like shoe more flexible. Light stability elements under the arch are noticeable but not obtrusive.

    Fit:True to size; available in regular, wide, and extra wide widths. Tongue feels slightly short but not bothersome on the run.

    In their words: "very stable for me" · "a little bit more firm than I'd prefer" · "kind of like plank like on the bottom"

    — Kofuzi , source
  • A reliable, stable, firmer daily trainer with the versatility to handle slightly faster miles; good value and durable, though not the most exciting ride.

    Ride:Firmer, poppier DNA Loft v3 midsole with a snappier, more traditional flat-feeling ride; more versatile than the Nimbus with a bit more pop off the toes; one reviewer finds the heel-to-toe transition not smooth

    Fit:True to size with a roomy toe box; narrower midfoot than the Nimbus; improved heel collar over the Ghost 16 with no Achilles rubbing

    In their words: "It's like a workhorse shoe" · "spritlier ride by far" · "lighter, more kind of poppy foam"

    — The Run Testers , 35 mi tested , source
  • Brooks added more forefoot foam and it transformed the shoe into a very good, versatile daily trainer.

    In their words: "extra foam under here has transformed it" · "right amount of softness" · "very good daily trainer"

    — FORDY RUNS , source
  • A surprisingly snappier, almost stable-neutral daily trainer with better heel transition and more versatility than past Ghosts, despite gaining weight.

    Ride:Snappier, stiffer forefoot than prior Ghosts with a smooth heel transition via a lateral bevel; feels lower than its 10 mm drop and borderline stable neutral thanks to midsole sidewalls/bucket.

    Fit:Lower volume, snugger and a little narrower than the 16; thick heel padding with a stiffer counter that may bother sensitive Achilles but breaks in.

    In their words: "a totally different shoe" · "way more aggressive" · "a much snappier shoe"

    — Doctors of Running , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the Nike Pegasus v42 if

  • Pegasus stalwarts who want a structured, mild-stability daily trainer for easy miles, walking, or all-day wear — EDDBUD
  • Runners who want a structured, mildly stable daily trainer and don't mind the weight — EDDBUD
  • Fans of the Pegasus 41 who want a versatile do-it-all daily shoe — FORDY RUNS
  • Daily training miles and a do-it-all workhorse for runners who want one shoe for running and gym use. — Believe in the Run

Consider the Brooks Ghost v17 if

  • Runners wanting a plush daily trainer with a hint of stability — Run Moore
  • A reliable, no-nonsense workhorse daily trainer for long, slow, and easy runs, with enough range to pop out marathon-pace miles. — The Run Testers
  • Runners wanting a more performance-leaning Ghost that can handle daily miles, long runs, and some workouts, including those with mild stability needs. — Doctors of Running
  • Beginner to intermediate runners looking for a reliable, stable, versatile cushioned daily trainer at good value — The Run Testers
  • Everyday runners wanting a versatile, well-built daily trainer. — FORDY RUNS
  • A versatile, reasonably priced daily trainer for runners wanting one pair to handle running, walking, and all-day wear. — Believe in the Run
Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.