Nike Vaporfly 4
Nike

Vaporfly 4

Race shoe · ZoomX · carbon plate

Open shoe page
Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3
Puma

Fast-R Nitro Elite 3

Race shoe · NITROFOAM Elite · carbon plate

Open shoe page

Nike Vaporfly 4 vs Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 5 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 5
Kofuzi, EDDBUD, The Run Testers, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

36 / 30 mm heel / forefoot
Stack
39 / 31 mm heel / forefoot
6 mm 2mm lower
Drop
8 mm
5.9 oz 167 g
Weight
6.0 oz 170 g
ZoomX PEBA
Midsole
NITROFOAM Elite aliphatic TPU
Full-length carbon fiber Flyplate curved
Plate
Full-length carbon fiber PWRPLATE
Racing engineered mesh
Upper
ULTRAWEAVE engineered mesh
$240 $60 less
MSRP
$300

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Puma wins on propulsion, durability, grip, and upper fit; Vaporfly 4 cheaper but inferior foam and plate presence

— EDDBUD on the Nike Vaporfly 4, source

Lighter-feeling but does less; less aggressive and less bouncy than the Puma; not the chosen shoe for a marathon PB

— The Run Testers on the Nike Vaporfly 4, source

Fast-R 3 is more aggressive and does more performance-wise than the Vaporfly 4

— The Run Testers on the Nike Vaporfly 4, source

Punchier, more aggressive and faster-feeling than the Vaporfly 4; more midsole and plate kick; better marathon choice when chasing a PB

— The Run Testers on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Fast-R 3 is about 10g heavier but has more heel stack; reviewer found V3 more exciting and propulsive, while Vaporfly 4 felt too gentle; Vaporfly 4 noted as one of the worst for durability

— EDDBUD on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Reviewer finds it reminiscent of the original Vaporfly in how it reduces the effort of running at fast paces

— The Run Testers on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Not as soft as the Vaporfly 3

— The Run Testers on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Vaporfly 4 is considerably more minimal in the way it rides

— The Run Testers on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Fast-R3 tested more efficient in lab testing at Puma HQ; both are competitive race day options

— The Run Testers on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Slightly more versatile race shoe for the price

— EDDBUD on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Puma smashes it in propulsion, durability, grip, and upper fit; Vaporfly 4 upper is comfortable but foam less engaging and plate less present

— EDDBUD on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Mentioned as an alternative option for everyday runners at similar price point

— FORDY RUNS on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Fast R3 was more efficient in lab tests for other testers; Vaporfly 4 felt more natural to the reviewer and offers more heel protection

— The Run Testers on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3, source

Nike Vaporfly 4 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • #4 carbon racer. Brings Vaporfly closer to Alphafly aesthetic — execution issues but still fun at fast paces. Extremely lightweight.

    In their words: "still very fun for running very fast" · "extremely lightweight shoe" · "execution issues going on with this shoe"

    — Kofuzi , source
  • Didn't make top 5. Lower stack, not as cushioned, narrow. More a 10K/half shoe than a marathon racer. More a competitor to the Takumi Sen 11 than to top-tier carbons.

    In their words: "not in the same league" · "still very narrow" · "Quite a costly shoe"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • A solid but limited race shoe that feels light and quick at shorter distances but lacks the midsole and bounce for longer races, especially the marathon.

    Ride:Lighter and closer to the ground than Vaporfly 3 with snappy, responsive ride and reliable landings; lacks midsole bounce and feels limited at longer distances; works well for shorter, faster efforts.

    Fit:Roomier than expected for such a lean, small-looking shoe with plenty of space for the big toe; race-hugging without feeling cramped, with some heel slipping fixable with attentive lacing; stay true to size.

    In their words: "designed for shorter distances" · "doesn't have enough midsole for me" · "a half marathon sweet spot"

    — The Run Testers , 50 mi tested , source
  • Not a flop — still a top-tier super shoe, but Nike has narrowed its purpose to 5K and 10K racing, making it less versatile than prior Vaporflies and a poor pick for half marathon or marathon distances.

    Ride:Lightest Vaporfly yet, makes 5K pace feel smooth and efficient; ZoomX shows quick compression where the foot lands

    Fit:Best-fitting Vaporfly to date with a slightly more narrow forefoot, traditional tongue and a secure spike-like lockdown; no heel slipping for Ben

    — Ben Is Running , 62 mi tested , source

Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • EDDBUD finds the Fast-R Nitro Elite 3's foam feels noticeably different and denser than previous Puma race shoes, describing it as a more aggressive shoe though slightly more forgiving than the DVA Nitro Elite 4.

    In their words: "certainly a more aggressive shoe" · "slightly denser and perhaps almost less airy foams"

    — EDDBUD , source
  • The Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 is one of the reviewer's all-time favourite race shoes, delivering proven real-world results including a marathon PB and a 5K PB; firmer and more efficient than the Cielo X1 but slightly harder on legs over long distances.

    Ride:Firmer than most carbon racers with a very noticeable rocker that dictates foot placement; relies heavily on the plate for propulsion; snappy and efficient but requires finding the sweet spot in form to get the best out of it

    Fit:Runs slightly long; half size down recommended especially if between sizes; narrow upper but flexible enough for most feet; good heel and midfoot lockdown

    In their words: "firmer and less springy" · "works best for shorter set distances" · "beats your legs up a bit more"

    — The Run Testers , 81 mi tested , source
  • Efficient and fast but Thomas feels it's a little less designed for form-breakdown than the DV8 Elite 4.

    Ride:Lab-tested by BITR at Puma's facility as more efficient than their race shoes. Different sensation with the extended plate. Megan's half-marathon pick. Polarizing look — 'more embarrassing to be in the Fast-R 3 on a bad day cuz it looks crazy.'

    In their words: "more efficient than other shoes" · "different sensation with this extended plate"

    — Believe in the Run , source
  • #1 carbon marathon racer of 2025. Lightweight, aggressive, springing up front — fixed what v2 had wrong and maintained v2's goodness.

    In their words: "very aggressive carbon fiber plate" · "made the shoe really lightweight" · "so light, because it's so aggressive"

    — Kofuzi , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the Nike Vaporfly 4 if

  • Short-distance races and turn-heavy courses — Believe in the Run
  • 10K to half marathon racing, track miles, shorter fast efforts — The Run Testers
  • Lighter forefoot/cadence runners doing 10K to half marathon racing. — EDDBUD
  • Half marathon sweet spot but versatile from shorter races up to marathon distance for runners who prefer a more direct ride — The Run Testers
  • Short-distance racing up to 10K, or up to half marathon for more seasoned runners wanting minimal cushion — The Run Testers
  • 5K through half marathon for runners who value low weight; lighter runners may also use for the marathon — EDDBUD

Consider the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 if

  • 10K to half marathon racing — Ben Is Running
  • Half marathon racing and speed workouts for neutral runners comfortable with a minimalist upper and aggressive race geometry — Believe in the Run
  • Racing 5K through marathon for runners with locked-in fast form chasing PBs — The Run Testers
  • Midfoot and forefoot striking runners looking for a very lightweight, propulsive race shoe for road marathons and speed work — EDDBUD
  • Shorter racing for runners who want the most aggressive option. — The Run Testers
  • Short-distance racing for mid/forefoot strikers seeking an aggressive ride — EDDBUD

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the Nike Vaporfly 4 and the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3?

The Nike Vaporfly 4 is a race shoe and the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 is a race shoe. By the numbers, the Nike Vaporfly 4 weighs 167g, has a 36mm heel stack and a 6mm drop, while the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 weighs 170g, has a 39mm heel stack and an 8mm drop. MSRP is $240 for the Nike Vaporfly 4 and $300 for the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3.

Should I buy the Nike Vaporfly 4 or the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3?

Believe in the Run on the Nike Vaporfly 4: Short-distance races and turn-heavy courses. Ben Is Running on the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3: 10K to half marathon racing.

Per Believe in the Run, Ben Is Running.

Has anyone reviewed both the Nike Vaporfly 4 and the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3?

Yes — EDDBUD, The Run Testers, and FORDY RUNS directly compared the Nike Vaporfly 4 and the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 in their reviews.

Per EDDBUD, The Run Testers, FORDY RUNS.

Which is more cushioned, the Nike Vaporfly 4 or the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3?

Measured by stack height, the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 has more underfoot foam — 39mm at the heel versus 36mm.

Which is cheaper, the Nike Vaporfly 4 or the Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 3?

The Nike Vaporfly 4 is cheaper at $240 versus $300 MSRP — about $60 less.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.