Saucony Endorphin Pro v5 vs Nike Vaporfly v4
A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 6 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.
Specs at a glance
| Saucony Endorphin Pro v5 | Nike Vaporfly v4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Stack (heel / forefoot) | 39.0 / 31.0 mm | 36.0 / 30.0 mm |
| Drop | 8.0 mm | 6.0 mm |
| Weight (men's 9) | 7.6 oz (215g) | 5.9 oz (167g) |
| Midsole | PWRRUN HG (PEBA) + PWRRUN PB (PEBA) dual-layer | ZoomX (PEBA) |
| Plate | Full-length carbon fiber plate | Full-length carbon fiber Flyplate (curved) |
| Upper | Recycled engineered mesh | Racing engineered mesh |
| MSRP | $240.00 | $240.00 |
The consensus read
Each paragraph is a synthesis across every reviewer in our database for that shoe — what they collectively concluded after wear-testing. Not a quote. Not one person's take. The shape of the room.
Saucony Endorphin Pro v5
A stable carbon-plated marathon shoe that divides testers: most praise its forgiving ride and reliable platform for heavier runners and longer distances, though some flag the firmer foam as dated and prefer its more aggressive competitors for shorter racing.
Nike Vaporfly v4
A radically lighter, snappier return to the original Vaporfly's aggressive racing DNA, best suited for 5K through half marathon but no longer a reliable marathon pick; reviewers praise the direct ride and ground feel but flag a narrow platform and reduced cushion for longer distances.
Reviewers who wore both
Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.
Same weight at size 10.5 (8.2 oz) but the Vaporfly is considered the better option at a similar price point
Saucony Endorphin Pro v5 — what reviewers say
Ride profile: high cushion , firm_responsive feel , high energy return , neutral stability , aggressive rocker.
-
Both reviewers found the Endorphin Pro 5 disappointing, calling it an outdated race day shoe that feels like it is from two years ago. With minimal innovation over the Pro 4, heavier weight than competitors, and firm foam that causes late-run fatigue, they rated it a pass and gave it a red light recommendation.
Ride:Foam feels firm and a bit dated compared to newer race day options. Dual foam midsole with Power Run HG on top for softer step-in feel and Power Run PB below for structure. Slotted carbon plate provides some pop but overall the shoe lacks the soft, propulsive feel of modern super shoes. Thomas experienced forefoot fatigue after 10 miles due to firmness.
Fit:Fits true to size. Accommodates wider feet despite being a race day shoe. Heel lockdown is good with no gaping around the collar. Requires untying to remove.
In their words: "the foam is a lot firmer" · "one of the heavier race day options" · "people who maybe prefer a firmer ride"
-
A wider, more stable and durable super-shoe with a smooth, consistent ride that suits heavier runners and those wanting a realistic marathon option, even if it's a touch heavier than some rivals.
Ride:Smooth, consistent ride with a smoother rocker-like transition from heel through mid to forefoot. Foams are more resilient and less squashy than competitors. PWRRUN PB foam holds onto its properties longer than many foams that dull at 100 miles. Wide landing platform in the heel that protrudes from the back of the shoe like a ski.
Fit:Widest in the heel of the shoes compared, with more structured upper and specifically placed overlays around the toe box providing more foot containment. Protective on top of the foot.
In their words: "the widest in the heel" · "very durable, very resilient" · "a very consistent smooth feel"
-
A subtle upper-focused update that is essentially the same shoe as the Pro 4 with a $15 tariff-driven price bump; capable but less aggressive than peers, and Kofuzi suggests grabbing discounted Pro 4s instead.
Ride:Nice compression and responsiveness from Power Run PB, but softer than ideal; slotted plate and HG top layer reduce pop. Stable heel suits midfoot/heel strikers.
Fit:Upper feels less precise, slightly baggy; feels like a cost-saving downgrade versus prior versions.
In their words: "a little bit on the soft side" · "ideal for midfoot and heel strikers" · "less aggressive than I'd like"
-
Fordy's pick as most stable carbon-plated marathon shoe thanks to new fluted plate design feeling steadier than v4.
In their words: "new fluted plate design in it" · "a stable ride in the marathon"
Nike Vaporfly v4 — what reviewers say
Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .
-
#4 carbon racer. Brings Vaporfly closer to Alphafly aesthetic — execution issues but still fun at fast paces. Extremely lightweight.
In their words: "still very fun for running very fast" · "extremely lightweight shoe" · "execution issues going on with this shoe"
-
Didn't make top 5. Lower stack, not as cushioned, narrow. More a 10K/half shoe than a marathon racer. More a competitor to the Takumi Sen 11 than to top-tier carbons.
In their words: "not in the same league" · "still very narrow" · "Quite a costly shoe"
-
A solid but limited race shoe that feels light and quick at shorter distances but lacks the midsole and bounce for longer races, especially the marathon.
Ride:Lighter and closer to the ground than Vaporfly 3 with snappy, responsive ride and reliable landings; lacks midsole bounce and feels limited at longer distances; works well for shorter, faster efforts.
Fit:Roomier than expected for such a lean, small-looking shoe with plenty of space for the big toe; race-hugging without feeling cramped, with some heel slipping fixable with attentive lacing; stay true to size.
In their words: "designed for shorter distances" · "doesn't have enough midsole for me" · "a half marathon sweet spot"
-
Not a flop — still a top-tier super shoe, but Nike has narrowed its purpose to 5K and 10K racing, making it less versatile than prior Vaporflies and a poor pick for half marathon or marathon distances.
Ride:Lightest Vaporfly yet, makes 5K pace feel smooth and efficient; ZoomX shows quick compression where the foot lands
Fit:Best-fitting Vaporfly to date with a slightly more narrow forefoot, traditional tongue and a secure spike-like lockdown; no heel slipping for Ben
Who should buy which
Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.
Consider the Saucony Endorphin Pro v5 if
- Heavier runners or those whose form breaks down during longer races; marathon distance where stability and a consistent ride matter — EDDBUD
- Midfoot and heel strikers wanting a less aggressive, more stable race shoe. — Kofuzi
- Marathoners wanting a stable, plated race day shoe — FORDY RUNS
- Faster workouts and shorter racing (5K to half marathon) for neutral runners without medial forefoot stability needs who want an aggressive, firm, snappy ride. — Doctors of Running
- Marathon and any race distance for runners wanting soft but guided cushioning. — EDDBUD
- Everyday marathon and half-marathon racers, heavier runners, and those with mild overpronation seeking a stable carbon-plated racer. — FORDY RUNS
Consider the Nike Vaporfly v4 if
- Shorter road racing (5K-10K) for runners whose feet fit the snugger upper — Doctors of Running
- Half marathon and below race day for efficient forefoot strikers willing to go all-out. — FORDY RUNS
- Short-distance races and turn-heavy courses — Believe in the Run
- 5K and 10K racing for runners wanting a light, direct, snappy carbon racer — Ben Is Running
- Short-distance racing up to 10K, or up to half marathon for more seasoned runners wanting minimal cushion — The Run Testers
- 10K to half marathon racing, track miles, shorter fast efforts — The Run Testers