Adidas Adizero SL 2
Adidas

Adizero SL 2

Daily trainer · Lightstrike Pro · no plate

Open shoe page
ASICS Novablast 5
ASICS

Novablast 5

Daily trainer · FF BLAST MAX · no plate

Open shoe page

Adidas Adizero SL 2 vs ASICS Novablast 5

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 7 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 7
The Run Testers, The Running Channel, EDDBUD, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

40 / 31 mm heel / forefoot
Stack
41 / 33 mm +2mm forefoot
9 mm
Drop
8 mm
8.4 oz 238 g · −9 g
Weight
8.7 oz 247 g
Lightstrike Pro (TPEE) top + Lightstrike 2.0 (EVA) base
Midsole
FF BLAST MAX EVA/OBC blend
None
Plate
None
Engineered mesh with targeted zonal support
Upper
Engineered jacquard mesh
$130 $10 less
MSRP
$140

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Tied for top spot at 10.5/12; Novablast 4 is better for long runs and has wider/better upper, SL 2 is the train-and-race pick

— EDDBUD on the Adidas Adizero SL 2

SL2 is narrower, roughly an ounce lighter and cheaper; Novablast is wider, more versatile all-rounder

— EDDBUD on the Adidas Adizero SL 2, source

Tied for top spot at 10.5/12; Novablast 4 is better for long runs and has wider/better upper, SL 2 is the train-and-race pick

— EDDBUD on the Adidas Adizero SL 2

Tied for top spot at 10.5/12; Novablast 4 is better for long runs and has wider/better upper, SL 2 is the train-and-race pick

— EDDBUD on the Adidas Adizero SL 2

Novablast 5 is wider and more all-round; SL2 is narrower, ~1oz lighter, better for uptempo/race use at a lower price

— EDDBUD on the ASICS Novablast 5, source

SL2 is cheaper but its outsole, insole and laces let it down versus the Novablast 5

— EDDBUD on the ASICS Novablast 5, source

Adidas Adizero SL 2 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • The Run Testers highlight the Adizero SL as a fantastic, best-value faster-training shoe — a sprightly, bouncy Lightstrike Pro ride that comes alive at harder paces without needing a plate, backed by strong outsole durability.

    Fit:Sizing may need some experimentation to find the optimal fit.

    In their words: "feels sprightly to run in" · "bouncy and lively when you want to pick up the pace" · "best value shoes to take care of your faster workouts"

    — The Run Testers , source
  • Picked as Best Value winner — a fantastic daily trainer at a price point that the hosts say must be hurting Adidas's margins, with Lightstrike foam that can handle race days.

    In their words: "Bonkers that the shoe is able to be at that price point" · "incredible"

    — The Running Channel , source
  • Ed's #7 of 2024 — incredible value (sometimes £65) for what it delivers.

    Ride:Light shoe with Lightstrike Pro tucked into a durable EVA frame. Versatile across paces. No Continental outsole but durability is fine.

    — EDDBUD , source
  • Number 5 daily trainer of 2024 — excellent for high school/college cross country runners and 5K-half marathon trainees who want a light, agile shoe under an hour.

    — Kofuzi

ASICS Novablast 5 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • A solid, comfortable all-round daily trainer that excels at easy and cruising paces, but feels a bit dull at faster efforts compared to the Novablast 6. A good buy if found at a significant discount.

    Ride:Balanced, comfortable ride with FF Blast Max foam; smooth and reliable but lacks pop off the forefoot at faster paces; feels more controlled and stable than the 6

    Fit:True to size with a roomy forefoot and good amount of space in the toe box; slightly more accommodating in the forefoot than the Novablast 6

    In their words: "nice shoe to cruise in" · "felt very smooth to be out in" · "a little bit dull"

    — The Run Testers , 75 mi tested , source
  • A go-to daily trainer pick that Ben describes as his current favourite in the category — soft, comfortable, and a great all-around choice.

    In their words: "a little bit more soft and squishy"

    — Ben Is Running , source
  • The reviewer considers the Novablast 5 the more versatile and balanced option for daily training and easy miles, with smoother transitions and a more plush upper, though it lacks the snappy responsiveness of the Sonicblast at faster paces.

    Ride:More compliant, softer feel from the Flight Foam Blast Max. Smoother transitions than the Sonicblast across a wider range of paces. More balanced geometry with slightly taller sidewalls. Lacks the spring of the Sonicblast but offers better versatility. Some complaints about traction in slick conditions.

    Fit:More plush upper with extra padding on the heel collar. Normal width through heel and midfoot, slightly wide forefoot. Good volume for foot swelling and accommodation.

    In their words: "feel very balanced" · "a little bit more plush" · "daily training and easy miles"

    — Doctors of Running , source
  • Steve considers the Novablast 5 one of the best everyday trainers at its $150 price point, with a fun, light, bouncy ride and the forefoot launchpad.

    In their words: "one of the best in that category" · "fits nice and well" · "the lowest stack height of the group"

    — Run Moore , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the Adidas Adizero SL 2 if

  • Budget-minded runners wanting a light, soft, uptempo-capable daily at a very low price — EDDBUD
  • Daily training including winter use where outsole grip matters, especially at sale prices — EDDBUD
  • Best-value all-purpose trainer of 2024, especially for newer runners or budget-conscious upgraders. — EDDBUD
  • Excellent-value daily trainer that can also race; gateway to Adidas's plated racers — The Running Channel

Consider the ASICS Novablast 5 if

  • Versatile, comfortable daily trainer for bigger miles and varied run types. — FORDY RUNS
  • Versatile daily trainer for mixed-pace training up to marathon pace. — The Run Testers
  • Comfort-focused daily training at easy paces. — EDDBUD
  • All-out comfort daily trainer for easy runs, long runs, newer runners, and comfortable first-marathon racers — The Run Testers
  • Runners who want a fun, bouncy daily trainer for easy miles and faster bursts — EDDBUD
  • A versatile everyday daily trainer for most runners at £135 — FORDY RUNS

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the Adidas Adizero SL 2 and the ASICS Novablast 5?

The Adidas Adizero SL 2 is a daily trainer and the ASICS Novablast 5 is a daily trainer. By the numbers, the Adidas Adizero SL 2 weighs 238g, has a 40mm heel stack and a 9mm drop, while the ASICS Novablast 5 weighs 247g, has a 41mm heel stack and an 8mm drop. MSRP is $130 for the Adidas Adizero SL 2 and $140 for the ASICS Novablast 5.

Should I buy the Adidas Adizero SL 2 or the ASICS Novablast 5?

EDDBUD on the Adidas Adizero SL 2: Budget-minded runners wanting a light, soft, uptempo-capable daily at a very low price. FORDY RUNS on the ASICS Novablast 5: Versatile, comfortable daily trainer for bigger miles and varied run types.

Per EDDBUD, FORDY RUNS.

Has anyone reviewed both the Adidas Adizero SL 2 and the ASICS Novablast 5?

Yes — EDDBUD directly compared the Adidas Adizero SL 2 and the ASICS Novablast 5 in their reviews.

Per EDDBUD.

Which is lighter, the Adidas Adizero SL 2 or the ASICS Novablast 5?

The Adidas Adizero SL 2 is lighter, at 238g versus 247g (men's 9) — about 9g less.

Which is cheaper, the Adidas Adizero SL 2 or the ASICS Novablast 5?

The Adidas Adizero SL 2 is cheaper at $130 versus $140 MSRP — about $10 less.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.