Saucony Endorphin Speed 5
Saucony

Endorphin Speed 5

Speed trainer · PWRRUN PB · nylon plate

Open shoe page
HOKA Mach 7
HOKA

Mach 7

Daily trainer · Supercritical EVA · no plate

Open shoe page

Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 vs HOKA Mach 7

A side-by-side comparison grounded in verdicts from 7 reviewers with every source linked. We don't invent quotes; every claim below is attributed.

Reviewers cited 7
The Run Testers, Kofuzi, Ben Is Running, and others
Methodology →

Specs at a glance

37 / 29 mm heel / forefoot
Stack
37 / 32 mm +3mm forefoot
8 mm
Drop
5 mm 3mm lower
8.4 oz 238 g
Weight
8.5 oz 241 g
PWRRUN PB PEBA
Midsole
Supercritical EVA
Nylon plate asymmetric medial wing
Plate
None
Engineered hexagon mesh
Upper
Creel jacquard
$175
MSRP
$145 $30 less

Reviewers who wore both

Direct paired observations — reviewers who actually ran in both of these and wrote the contrast. This is the strongest comparative signal on the page.

Mach X2 has higher stack, softer springier ride and better forefoot protection for long hard runs

— The Run Testers on the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5, source

Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , neutral stability .

  • The Run Testers still rate the Endorphin Speed 5 a top faster-daily pick — light, snug, and peppy thanks to PWRRUN PB foam and a nylon plate, comfortable enough for long runs too, and a smart buy now it's dropped in price.

    In their words: "pleasingly light and has a fit that's snug" · "smooth and peppy fashion" · "remains a smart buy"

    — The Run Testers , source
  • Kofuzi sees the Endorphin Speed 5 as more heel-stable than the SC Rebel but less lively at tempo paces due to its stability-oriented plastic plate, and a strong value pick now discounted to $150.

    Ride:More stable in the heel than the SC Rebel, but the plastic plate gives less forefoot pop at tempo efforts than the SC Rebel or the carbon-plated Endorphin Pro

    In their words: "much more stable in the heel" · "I feel like it's almost disappearing"

    — Kofuzi , source
  • A well-named speed shoe with a flexible nylon plate — a good dual-use option for training and budget-friendly racing without the cost of a full carbon super shoe.

    — Ben Is Running , source
  • A nimble, soft, well-balanced speed-day shoe whose biggest weakness is price — at GBP 180 it's hard to justify against the cheaper Zoom Fly 6 and Boston 13.

    Ride:Softest midsole of the four (around Shore A 23) with a nice compressive heel and a rolling action; full PEBA midsole feels compressive and easy to shift up through the gears. Outsole durability has improved over previous versions.

    Fit:Configurable upper but less generous than the previous Speed 4; works for slightly narrow feet; traditional running-shoe feel over the top of the foot.

    In their words: "more consistent and soft ride" · "easy to go up through the gears" · "a nice rolling action"

    — EDDBUD , source

HOKA Mach 7 — what reviewers say

Ride profile: high cushion , firm_responsive feel , moderate energy return , neutral stability , moderate rocker.

  • The reviewer sees the Mach 7 as better suited to faster training paces than the Clifton Pro and says it's the Hoka daily shoe he'd actually choose given its much lighter weight, despite the Pro offering more cushioning for longer runs.

    Ride:Firmer than the Clifton Pro and better suited to faster tempo and threshold paces, while still capable as a daily shoe; the Pro offers more cushioning for longer runs.

    In their words: "picking up the Mach 7 every day" · "slightly firmer than the Clifton Pro"

    — Ben Parkes , source
  • A simple, versatile, entry-priced daily trainer the reviewers say they'd recommend to anybody at any level.

    Ride:Up-tempo trainer on a super critical foam midsole that goes with the runner when they want to pick up the pace.

    Fit:Lightweight upper carried over largely unchanged from the previous version.

    In their words: "it just kind of works" · "it goes with you"

    — Believe in the Run , source
  • The Mach 7 improves on its predecessor with a slightly softer and bouncier midsole and a more accommodating upper, making it a solid stable-neutral lightweight trainer.

    Ride:Midsole feels a touch softer and bouncier than the previous version while remaining snappy underfoot. Stack height is tall on paper but does not feel tall on foot.

    Fit:Upper is still a little snug and short in the forefoot but has opened up compared to version 6 where toes felt jammed.

    In their words: "a touch softer and bouncier than the old one" · "still be snappy underfoot"

    — Doctors of Running , source
  • The Mach 7 is eliminated in the group stage, seen as less exciting than the Adios Pro Evo 3 and Salomon Aero Glide 4 Gravel in the same group.

    — The Run Testers , source

Who should buy which

Use cases the reviewers above actually call out — one bullet per distinct take, attributed. Where reviewers converge (e.g. "5K to half marathon" appearing across multiple takes) the agreement is a stronger buying signal than any single voice.

Consider the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 if

  • All-round daily training and faster efforts for runners who don't mind a firmer, snappier ride — The Run Testers
  • Streamlined allrounder for marathon training and racing. — The Run Testers
  • A versatile training partner to a carbon race shoe for runners wanting a fast daily trainer that can also handle easy runs and even racing — The Run Testers
  • Road ultra runners who prefer ground feel and a more connected, faster-rolling ride rather than maximum cushioning. — The Run Testers
  • Speed sessions and budget racing for runners who want a plated speed shoe — Ben Is Running
  • Runners wanting a versatile speed-focused trainer that can double as a race shoe over shorter distances, with a nimble, responsive feel — The Run Testers

Consider the HOKA Mach 7 if

  • A versatile, stable, cushioned lightweight daily trainer for easy runs, long runs, and sustained workouts — The Run Testers
  • Runners who want a natural, connected ride across a range of paces and distances. — The Run Testers
  • Daily training miles for runners at any level; Thomas picks it for his own daily-mileage rotation slot. — Believe in the Run
  • Lightweight daily training; stable neutral option for those who need a firmer trainer — Doctors of Running
  • Lighter performance training shoe for neutral to mild guidance needs runners who want a versatile all-arounder at moderate stack height — Doctors of Running
  • Fans of a simple, lightweight uptempo daily trainer who already like the Mach line. — FORDY RUNS

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 and the HOKA Mach 7?

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 is a speed trainer and the HOKA Mach 7 is a daily trainer. By the numbers, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 weighs 238g, has a 37mm heel stack and an 8mm drop, while the HOKA Mach 7 weighs 241g, has a 37mm heel stack and a 5mm drop. The Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 has a Nylon plate (asymmetric medial wing); the HOKA Mach 7 has none. MSRP is $175 for the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 and $145 for the HOKA Mach 7.

Should I buy the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 or the HOKA Mach 7?

The Run Testers on the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5: All-round daily training and faster efforts for runners who don't mind a firmer, snappier ride. The Run Testers on the HOKA Mach 7: A versatile, stable, cushioned lightweight daily trainer for easy runs, long runs, and sustained workouts.

Per The Run Testers.

Has anyone reviewed both the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 and the HOKA Mach 7?

Yes — The Run Testers directly compared the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 and the HOKA Mach 7 in their reviews.

Per The Run Testers.

Which is cheaper, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 or the HOKA Mach 7?

The HOKA Mach 7 is cheaper at $145 versus $175 MSRP — about $30 less.

Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized, not copied verbatim, and each links to its source. We weight reviewer voices differently based on testing methodology and credentials — clinical and lab-verified sources carry more weight than community commentary — but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.