ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27
Road Easy Recovery

ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27

A maximally cushioned daily trainer that prioritizes comfort on easy and recovery miles, though reviewers split on whether its softer, rolling character or firmer, deadened feel better suits their stride; best for heel strikers and neutral runners seeking protection over versatility.

"softer, smoother, protective road eating comfort" — The Run Testers
Physical blueprint

Where this shoe sits

Weight 295 g
Heel stack 43.0 mm
Drop 8.0 mm
Cushioning Maximal

Best for

Recovery & EasyDaily Training
Suits Heel strikers
Pronation Neutral
Surface Road
Lifespan 400-500+ mi

Specifications

Weight (M9)
295g (10.4 oz)
Stack (Heel)
43.0 mm
Stack (Forefoot)
35.0 mm
Drop
8.0 mm
Midsole
FF Blast Plus Eco (EVA)
Outsole
ASICSGRIP + AHAR rubber
Upper
Engineered jacquard mesh
Lacing
Traditional

Fit Profile

Length
True To Size
Forefoot Width
Wide
Midfoot Width
Average
Heel Width
Snug
Lockdown
Good
Toe Box
Roomy
Sizing
True To Size

Ride Characteristics

Cushioning
Maximal
Stability
Neutral

Durability

Expected Miles
400-500+
Outsole
Above Average

Expert reviews · 3 reviewers · grouped per channel

DO
Doctors of Running Youtube

Dr. Klein prefers the Nimbus 27 over the Diadora Cellula — the foam change made it firmer and more resilient, what he wished the Cumulus could be.

+1 earlier review from Doctors of Running

Soft, plush, stable premium daily trainer best for easy and long runs; heavier but smooth.

Best for: Easy runs, long runs, recovery for neutral runners wanting soft premium cushion

140 miles tested · source
RM
Run Moore Youtube

A cool-looking max-cushion trainer that the reviewer liked aesthetically, but it felt heavier and like a little too much compared to the 28.

TR
The Run Testers Youtube

A softer, smoother, maximally cushioned shoe built for all-out easy-mile comfort, but heavy and limited to slower paces.

Best for: Runners prioritizing all-out comfort and protection on easy and recovery miles, particularly heel strikers and heavier runners

35 miles tested · source
+3 earlier reviews from The Run Testers

A very comfortable, wide, max-cushion neutral daily/easy shoe with slightly more softness and heel protection than the Kayano 32, though the heel-to-toe transition doesn't work for everyone and it's not versatile for faster paces.

Best for: Neutral runners wanting max cushion for easy runs and long runs, especially heel strikers who want extra protection and forefoot cushion.

37 miles tested · source

Preferred of the two max-cushion shoes: a comfortable, naturally stable cruiser with a more flowing, versatile ride than the Bondi 9.

Best for: Easy/long runs for most runners, including those who want one cushion shoe that can also handle some faster running

36 miles tested · source

A solid, comfortable, stable cushioned shoe held back for this reviewer by a firmer midsole and a transition that feels dead rather than rolling; preferable to the More V6 only if you specifically need more stability.

Best for: Runners who want a stable, firmer-feeling max-cushion comfort shoe, or walking

Where it sits among similar shoes

Compared to other road easy recovery in the same lane.

Weight · lower = lighter Men's size 9
ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27
295g
Nike Vomero Plus
281g
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
298g
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22
303g
Heel stack · higher = more cushioning mm
ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27
43.0mm
Nike Vomero Plus
43.0mm
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
40.0mm
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22
39.0mm
Drop · higher = more heel-leaning mm
ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27
8.0mm
Nike Vomero Plus
10.0mm
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
8.0mm
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22
10.0mm

ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27

Data-driven recommendation backed by expert reviews.

Ask the advisor
Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized from named, linked sources — never copied verbatim. We weight clinical and lab-tested sources more heavily than community commentary, but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.
Last updated 2026-05-05