Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running has reviewed 225 shoes in the Next Pair catalog. Below: their verdict on each, with a source link to the full review on their own channel.
Daily training 101
-
"improved bevel makes this shoe way better" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The Adrenaline GTS 25 is a consistently comfortable, moderately stable daily trainer with improved heel transition and a prominent medial post that delivers clear arch support, making it the better pick for those who want traditional stability feel and higher-volume fit.
Best for: Walkers and easy runners who want traditional medial post arch support and a consistent soft ride; good for all-day standing and walking as arch fatigues
-
"balanced rocker geometry" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A moderately soft, bouncy trainer with a balanced rocker geometry and reinforced exoskeleton upper, offering versatile performance at an accessible price.
-
"very soft, very bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A soft, very bouncy versatile trainer with a simple upper and gradual rocker that can handle faster paces as well as easy runs.
-
"feels really close to the ground" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A responsive, racing-flat-feeling trainer that's the lightest-feeling and lowest-riding of the group; Matt finds it handles both long runs and workouts despite feeling like minimal shoe, with the previous version's fit issues fixed enough by break-in.
Best for: Runners wanting a snappy, low-riding, close-fitting performance trainer with a touch of medial stability for speed work and versatile training.
-
"the softest Rebel by far" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The comfort winner of the group — softest Rebel ever and one of the most comfortable shoes here — but the slow-rebounding foam and less aggressive geometry make it the least responsive and not the pick for fast running.
Best for: Runners who want maximum soft comfort in a light package for daily training and easy or long runs rather than outright speed; also the best walking shoe of the group.
-
"bouncy, but not insanely bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt rates the Deviate Nitro Pure as one of the best well-rounded shoes in the budget performance trainer category — not the best at any single task but very good at everything, with excellent durability so far.
Best for: Runners wanting one well-rounded, neutral do-it-all performance trainer for easy runs, workouts, long runs, and even races.
-
"really came out of nowhere for us" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's favorite of the group: a rockered, medially stable performance trainer that excels at longer, faster efforts and would be his race pick from this set, though the big rocker gets in the way over shorter fast efforts and it won't suit runners with lateral stability needs.
Best for: Runners needing medial stability who want a rockered shoe for long uptempo efforts, long workouts, and marathon or half-marathon paced running.
-
"beautiful simplicity" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A beautifully simple, lightweight daily trainer with nothing fancy but a really good geometry; the kind of straightforward shoe that's sometimes exactly what you want.
Best for: Simple, lightweight daily trainer for easy miles that can also pick up the pace
-
"pretty compliant foam" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Nate observes that the Neo Vista 3's lateral midsole concavity versus a flatter medial sidewall creates a slight lateral landing bias, which gives the shoe's compliant foam some built-in guidance and stability. He frames this as neither good nor bad on its own — it's a good fit only if that guidance matches the runner's mechanics and preferences.
-
"smooth rolling rocker platform" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A smooth, high-stack daily trainer with a pronounced rocker platform, though the firm Nitro foam surprised the reviewer given the massive stack; promising after one run but more testing needed.
-
"really deep grooves through the mid-sole" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Runners who want forefoot flex and have good big-toe joint mobility in a maximally stacked shoe
-
"sinking into the medial forefoot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Polarizing — works for stiff-mechanics neutral runners, can actively injure runners who don't pronate naturally because of the lateral-flare + soft-forefoot interaction. The franchise has moved away from snappy-firm into soft-bouncy.
Best for: Runners with stiff mechanics who want a soft marathon-pace alternative to plated super shoes — and only after the 50–60 mile break-in is past
-
"the best balance of bounce" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Universally loved across the DoR team — best balance of any super-trainer this year for daily training through marathon racing, with excellent durability.
Best for: Versatile do-it-all daily trainer that can also serve as a marathon-racing alternative for runners who don't gel with aggressive super shoes
-
"really soft" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Picked as the marathon-racing-alternative winner of the group — softest and lightest, but the soft foam is unstable and requires significant miles to break in.
Best for: Marathon racing alternative for runners who can't gel with carbon-plated super shoes — the lightest of this super-trainer group
-
"the snappiest" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Picked as the most-stable and most-versatile of the three super trainers, with the snappiest ride and best durability — the reviewer's overall favorite of the group.
Best for: Versatile super trainer that can handle daily training through faster tempo work — best balance of stability, snap, and durability
-
Doctors of Running notes: v14 is the more grounded, non-bouncy walking-leaning of the two 860 generations — its dead Fresh Foam X midsole and laterally biased wedge work for runners who want maximum medial elevation but no bounce, but most runners will find the v15 the better runnable shoe.
Best for: Runners who want non-bouncy, grounded full-length stability with a strong lateral bias and a smoother out-of-box transition; better as a walker/daily plodder than a responsive runner.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Behaves much like a plated shoe due to its longitudinal stiffness; soft FlyteFoam Leap and aggressive lateral sole flare can irritate IT-band-prone runners — caveat shoe for those with lateral structures issues.
Best for: Stable-neutral runners who want a high-stack soft daily/long-run shoe and aren't sensitive to lateral sole flare
-
Doctors of Running notes: An interesting niche shoe — high stack with unusual flexibility through midfoot and forefoot. Best for neutral runners who want flexibility with cushion; the upper runs warm and the lateral flex groove can cause hot spots.
Best for: Niche neutral runners who specifically want a high-stack but very flexible daily trainer
-
Doctors of Running notes: Surprisingly stable-neutral with very high sidewalls and a tall medial arch — Matt has done long runs and workouts in it without issue. Firmer and snappier than the Endorphin Azura and his pick for runners wanting more obvious medial structure.
Best for: Heavier or pronation-prone runners who want a firmer, snappier max-cushion daily trainer with high sidewalls and a tall medial arch
-
Doctors of Running notes: An accidental stable-neutral shoe — the lateral cutout, firmer PWRRUN PB platform, and aggressive rocker create a grounded, mildly guidance-y ride that pairs well with mild stability needs. A standout value at $150.
Best for: Runners who want a firm, rockered, stable-neutral PWRRUN PB trainer that can also handle uptempo work; great option for IT band/lateral-sensitive runners due to lateral cutout
-
"extremely lightweight on foot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Nate found the Megablast extremely lightweight and smooth across a wide pace range, with increasing responsiveness at faster efforts. He sees it as a versatile workout-to-racing option that slots in faster and lighter than the Superblast.
Best for: Runners wanting a lightweight workout-to-race shoe that is less aggressive than traditional super shoes but still delivers pop at faster paces
-
"feel very balanced" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The reviewer considers the Novablast 5 the more versatile and balanced option for daily training and easy miles, with smoother transitions and a more plush upper, though it lacks the snappy responsiveness of the Sonicblast at faster paces.
Best for: Versatile daily training and easy miles for runners of all levels
-
"much better heel transition" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A consistent and reliable moderate stability shoe with the best heel transition in Adrenaline history thanks to the new 10mm drop, but the DNA Loft v3 midsole lacks bounce and firms up uncomfortably on longer runs, making it better suited for walking and short-to-moderate distance running than longer efforts.
Best for: Short to moderate distance runs and walking for overpronators who want consistent moderate stability at the heel and midfoot
-
"rocker just feels very gentle" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The reviewer considers the 1080v15 a significant improvement over previous versions thanks to the new Infinion midsole, which makes the shoe lighter, more compliant, and bouncier while maintaining high cushioning. It delivers the natural, streamlined daily trainer feel the 1080 series has always needed.
Best for: Runners wanting a lightweight, cushioned neutral daily trainer with a natural ride feel
-
"more bounce" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The lightest and most responsive of the three, the 1080 v15 offers the best energy return and a roomy stretchy fit, making it the most versatile option for daily training despite being the most expensive.
Best for: Runners wanting a versatile, bouncy daily trainer with a roomy stretchy upper
-
"really stiff shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The firmest and most structured of the three, the 880 v15 offers excellent stability for a neutral shoe with a pronounced rocker geometry, best durability, and a wide but low-volume fit, though its stiff heel counter may not suit everyone.
Best for: Runners wanting a structured, stable neutral trainer or those on their feet all day who prefer a firmer rocker ride
-
"soft, it's bouncy, it's rhythmic" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: David ranks it his #3 of 2026 so far — a soft, bouncy, rhythmic trainer that settles into easy miles, though the soft heel and forefoot may not suit runners who prefer firmer midsoles.
-
"long runs and steady efforts" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea's updated #1 shoe of 2026 so far — a medially biased daily trainer and long-run workhorse that has replaced the Mizuno Wave Rebellion Flash 2 in her rotation.
-
"I can actually run fast in this shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Both David and Andrea rank it among their favorites of 2026 so far — a stable-neutral long-run and daily trainer with a nice heel bevel, forefoot rocker, and excellent lockdown that pairs well with the Lightspray variant.
-
"the light spray is nimble" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: David's preferred pick of the Cloudmonster Hyper 3 pair — a lightweight, stable-neutral trainer that can handle long runs and faster efforts, though the high medial sidewall may be an issue for some runners.
-
"fall into rhythm really easy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: David's #1 shoe of 2026 so far — a versatile, stable-neutral trainer with a late-stage rocker that handles both easy miles and faster efforts in the same ride. Andrea's mechanics did not mesh with it.
-
"softer than the prior version" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Lightest stability shoe in the US with uniquely full-length H-frame support, but a clunky heel transition and quickly-compacting EVA midsole make it disappointing for heel strikers and long-run comfort; better as a walking shoe or for mid/forefoot strikers.
Best for: Slower runners who land mid-foot/forefoot and need stability, plus walking and long standing shifts on hard surfaces
-
Doctors of Running notes: A big positive surprise over v1 — much improved heel transition and bevel, secure upper, and a Nitrofoam midsole that bounces well. Best-suited to heel strikers who want neutral central guidance.
Best for: Heel strikers who want true central guidance — keeps the foot in the middle without biasing either way
-
Doctors of Running notes: An honorable-mention surprise — one of the few decent stability shoes with an anatomic toe box, mild medial post, and good for walking, though heavier and less bouncy than the leaders.
Best for: Runners who want a stability shoe with an anatomic, foot-shaped toe box and lower drop
-
"very versatile" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Klein and Solless prefer it over the Super Blast 2 for its better heel transition, forefoot fit and slightly livelier foam; Nathan still picks the Super Blast 2 for its proven stability and durability.
Best for: Long easy-day training shoe that can pick up the pace a little.
-
"way more comfortable" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Nathan's clear pick over the Sonic Blast as a $150 daily trainer; smoother, more balanced and cheaper.
Best for: Versatile daily trainer for easy paces and general training.
-
"more accommodating stretch" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Nathan's pick over the Megablast for proven stability and durability; Klein and Solless find the forefoot taper and heel transition hold it back vs the newer Megablast.
Best for: High-mileage versatile long-run and training shoe for runners who prize stability and proven durability.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Doctors of Running prefers the GT-2000 13 over version 14 for runners who want a lighter, more versatile guidance-style stability trainer with a smoother heel transition and snappier feel.
Best for: Runners wanting a lighter, more versatile mild-to-moderate stability daily trainer with better forefoot flexibility and a smoother heel bevel
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt prefers the Structure 26 overall as the more comfortable, versatile and medially supportive option — a true moderate stability shoe rather than the firmer, snappier stable-neutral ride of v25.
Best for: Runners wanting a softer, medially supportive daily shoe for easy running, walking, and all-day standing.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Very different from v7: softer, higher drop, wider, more balanced H-frame stability. Better for longer/relaxed runs; v7 still wins for lower drop and firmer, snappier, more in-your-face stability.
Best for: Runners wanting a lighter stability shoe with balanced guidance, longer efforts, and those with Achilles or posterior tib issues who prefer a higher drop
-
"a totally different shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A surprisingly snappier, almost stable-neutral daily trainer with better heel transition and more versatility than past Ghosts, despite gaining weight.
Best for: Runners wanting a more performance-leaning Ghost that can handle daily miles, long runs, and some workouts, including those with mild stability needs.
-
"the first Rebel that really worked for me" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The first Rebel in the series that finally clicked for the reviewer — a very soft, bouncy, responsive shoe that he plans to run a half marathon in.
-
"super soft and bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A softer, bouncier lightweight trainer that excels at easy runs with some uptempo, with a roomier fit but less stability than the Endorphin Speed 5.
Best for: Easy runs with some uptempo for neutral runners who want a softer, bouncier lightweight trainer with more forefoot room
-
"fun and versatile shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A plush, nimble and lightweight daily trainer with a bouncier FuelCell midsole and stiffer forefoot than v4, versatile across paces with an excellent lockdown.
Best for: Versatile lightweight trainer skewing toward tempo, long runs, and workouts, though capable across easy paces and races
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt names the Solution 2 a long-run favorite with 100+ miles on it — softer and wider than the Tempus 2, with super-foam bounce for runners who want stability without a firm ride.
Best for: Mild-stability runners who want a wider-fitting, softer super-foam trainer for daily miles, long runs and workouts.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt calls the Solution 2 a great-value ($140) lightweight stability trainer with a notable PEBA midsole, mild-to-moderate guidance that breaks in nicely, and excellent outsole durability over 100 miles — one of the best stability shoes of 2025.
Best for: Stability runners wanting a versatile lighter-weight daily trainer that can handle easy runs, long runs, tempo workouts and even long-distance racing.
-
Doctors of Running notes: A different shoe than the V17 — heavier, more cushioned, slightly firmer, bouncier, more neutral, less versatile but a very solid easy/long run premium daily trainer at a $10-cheaper price.
Best for: Easy runs, long runs, and recovery for runners wanting a premium max-cushion daily trainer with bounce; better for wider feet than the V17.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Doctors of Running's Matt rates the ForeverRun Nitro 2 as one of his top stability shoes of 2025 — durable Nitro foam, smooth transition, moderate guided ride, with the only real knock being a thin tongue that can cause lace bite at the low instep.
Best for: Runners who need moderate, full-length stability/guidance for daily training and long runs, especially heel strikers and those who want non-overbearing motion control with bounce.
-
Doctors of Running notes: In a head-to-head with the Saucony Tempus 2, Matt gives the nod to the Solution 2 — softer PEBA, smoother and more nimble ride, wider fit, and more versatile across paces. The Tempus 2 is the pick for runners wanting more aggressive stability or a narrower race-type upper.
Best for: Mild-stability runners who want a softer, more versatile, more forgiving daily trainer that can also handle tempo workouts and long-distance racing.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Doctors of Running calls the ForeverRun Nitro 2 their stability shoe of the year so far in 2025 — a massive update over the clunky v1 with a smoother ride, full-length centralized guidance, and a much-improved upper, despite gaining ~1oz of weight.
Best for: Runners who want full-length centralized guidance at moderate stability — a great alternative to the Saucony Tempus (less narrow) or Brooks Glycerin GTS (less guide-rail-stiff).
-
Doctors of Running notes: A more focused, structured daily-trainer evolution of v1 — firmer ride, better upper lockdown, grippier outsole, and clearer daily-training identity in the lineup; the reviewer recommends it to v1 fans and notes the Cloudsurfer Next is the lighter snappier option.
Best for: Daily training and long runs for runners who liked the original Cloudsurfer's plush feel but wanted something more structured, durable, and committed to its daily-trainer identity.
-
"a stable neutral shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A more maximal, firmer and more stable-neutral daily trainer than the 1080, with a stiffer rocker forefoot — better for runners needing stability and forefoot room.
Best for: Runners wanting a maximal, firmer, more stable daily trainer with an aggressive rocker.
-
"much higher stack height" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A much more maximal, rockered and stable-neutral daily trainer than v14 — heavier and stiffer, with more cushioning but a similar firm underfoot feel.
Best for: Runners wanting a maximal, rockered daily trainer with more cushioning and stable-neutral support.
-
"more like a true neutral shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Preferred over the Bondi 9 by both Dr. Brown and Dr. Klein — a balanced, firmer-cushioned daily trainer with a versatile ride that can handle a little pace.
-
"traditional Hoka Clifton" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A solid continuation of the Clifton lineage — lighter and more nimble than the Bondi 9 while keeping the firm, rockered Clifton DNA.
Best for: Runners wanting a lighter, more traditional neutral Hoka daily trainer
-
"great shoe for mileage" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A softer, roomier, relaxed easy-day trainer that excels at mileage but trades away the speed versatility of the Novablast 4.
Best for: Relaxed easy-day and long-mileage shoe when pace isn't the priority.
-
"responsive Snappy underfoot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A snappy, rigid, stable-neutral trainer-racer that excels at workouts, tempo and marathon pace — Matt's recommended pick for runners who want speed versatility.
Best for: Workout, tempo, long-run and marathon-racing shoe; good alternative for runners who don't get on with the aggressive Metaspeed series.
-
"really nice and bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A significant redesign that shifts the Novablast toward a softer, more comfortable daily trainer role with excellent durability; better for easy and long runs than picking up the pace.
Best for: Easy miles, long runs, and recovery days for neutral runners who want a softer alternative to the Gel-Cumulus
-
"Nova blast 5 felt very firm" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, more responsive trainer than the 361 Eleos that trades softness for propulsion; best for runners who want one shoe that covers daily miles and picks up the pace.
Best for: Versatile daily trainer that can stretch up to faster efforts and 10K racing
-
"lends itself more to daily training" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A softer, smoother, more stable and more durable update that shifts the Novablast toward a trainer role; the better choice for most runners who prioritize comfort and transition over snap.
Best for: Daily training, easy runs, and long runs — with light workout capability — for neutral runners who want a softer, smoother ride
-
Doctors of Running notes: After 128 miles, David at Doctors of Running calls the GT-2000 13 his 'Old Reliable' for 2024 and one of his favorite shoes of the year, praising its versatility and exceptional outsole durability.
Best for: A workhorse moderate-stability daily trainer for the full range of training paces, including some strides and uptempo work
-
Doctors of Running notes: The 860 v14 is the more aggressive of New Balance's two Fresh Foam stability shoes — a full-length dual-density medial wedge delivers moderate-to-high medial stability that's rare on the market, paired with a soft cushioned ride and a wider fit, making it a standout for serious overpronators.
Best for: Aggressive stability needs across the full length of the foot in a daily trainer, especially for runners with wider feet who want max-cushion stability for slower paces and long runs. Likely Doctors of Running's stability shoe of the year.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt at Doctors of Running finds the GT-2000 13 firmer, snappier, and more aggressively stable than version 12 — better for runners who want one shoe to do daily miles plus workouts, though he personally still prefers v12 for everyday comfort.
Best for: Runners wanting a do-it-all moderate stability shoe with a snappier, slightly faster ride than the GT-2000 12
-
"the sole is so wide" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A wider-based lightweight trainer that felt stable and long-run-capable for Matt but rocked Andrea backwards into Achilles discomfort because her landing zone missed the outsole rubber.
Best for: Runners who land on the rear outsole patch — works great as a lightweight cushioned trainer; not for those who land behind the patch
-
"found the heel clunky" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A tall max-cushion trainer whose aggressive heel flare works well for some runners (midfoot strikers, Andrea) but clunks badly for others (heel strikers, Matt), illustrating that foot strike and landing location drive the experience.
Best for: Easy runs and daily training for midfoot strikers who tolerate a tall shoe with notable lateral heel flare
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt at Doctors of Running calls the GT-2000 13 the lighter, snappier, more versatile of the two stability stalwarts — better for uptempo work and runners who need only mild-to-moderate medial stability.
Best for: Runners who want a versatile mild-to-moderate stability daily trainer that can also handle uptempo work, with a snug, lower-volume fit
-
"more bouncy but slightly firmer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A more premium, more aggressive-feeling version of the Novablast that handles everything from easy runs to intervals to marathon racing; the marathon shoe for most runners who don't need a plated super-racer.
Best for: Mid-pack marathon runners who want a single shoe for training and racing; long runs and workouts at tempo/threshold
-
Doctors of Running notes: Doctors of Running's Matt Klein is excited about the 860 v14 not because it's the universal best stability shoe but because the full-length wedge design is rare and meaningful for a specific runner population — much smoother and lighter than v13, though runners prone to lateral instability or IT-band issues should look elsewhere.
Best for: Overpronators who benefit from a wedge-style medial elevation rather than traditional posting; specifically a unique option that's been rare on the market since the Vongo v5 era.
-
"tallest in the bounciest foam" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's personal favorite and the go-to long run shoe of the trio — a bouncy, stiff, stable-neutral trainer that doubles as an excellent non-plated marathon or half-marathon racer.
Best for: Long runs, uptempo efforts, and non-plated marathon/half-marathon racing for runners wanting a bouncy, stable-neutral trainer.
-
"improved in almost every way" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A tweaked-not-overhauled update to the Superblast: better upper lockdown, more toe-box volume, slightly more compliant foam, and improved outsole grip all make it an improvement over V1 with the same versatile ride.
Best for: Runners who want a single shoe to do daily training, workouts, and a marathon
-
"more of a versatile shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: More versatile across paces and more forgiving for heel strikers than the Hyperboost Edge thanks to a proper heel bevel, roomier upper, and better walking comfort — but it can't match the Hyperboost Edge's top-end bounce and has notably worse outsole durability.
Best for: A versatile daily trainer across easy to moderately quick paces for runners who want a comfortable, flexible, higher-volume fit with a smooth heel transition — including runners who prefer a shoe that also doubles well for walking.
-
"insanely resilient and bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A genuinely exciting debut of Hyperboost Pro foam — bouncy, resilient, and durable — hampered by a fatal biomechanical flaw in the heel design (posterior flare instead of a bevel) that causes a clunky transition and overloads the shin muscles in heel strikers. Works for forefoot/midfoot landers and supinators, but heel strikers and runners needing medial stability should avoid.
Best for: Midfoot/forefoot strikers who want an insanely bouncy super-trainer with a secure low-volume fit for uptempo work, tempo runs, and even marathon racing for recreational runners.
-
"had so much fun running in this shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Nathan calls the Mega Blast a blast to run in, highlighting crazy energy return, ultralight weight (~230g), and a rhythmic ride from easy miles up to half-marathon pace.
Best for: Runners who want the most bounce in a true daily trainer; can also serve as a long-run or race shoe for efficient runners.
-
"go-to long run shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: One of Matt's shoes of the year — a simple, durable, lightweight super trainer with a versatile slightly-firm-but-bouncy midsole that excels at long runs and serves as a great marathon racer for most runners.
Best for: Most runners looking for a super trainer that doubles as a marathon racer — long runs, uptempo long runs, and easy miles on smooth road surfaces.
-
"extremely poppy and responsive" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A livelier, lighter, more race-ready sibling to the Superblast 2 that differentiates itself through a bouncier ride, though durability of the new foam is still unproven.
Best for: Half-marathon to marathon racing and harder/longer efforts for neutral runners who don't need a true super shoe.
-
"softer, plush, compliant experience" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dave frames the Superblast 3 as the plush, soft-riding counterpart to the Cloudmonster 3 Hyper: lighter and more compliant on top, still stable on the base, and best at easy shuffling paces with some pickup potential.
Best for: Runners who want a plush, soft, lightweight super trainer for easy and long miles with some upside for faster efforts.
-
"go-to long run shoe for me" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A comfort-oriented long-run trainer that trades some Superblast 2 structure for softer, lighter step-in feel.
Best for: Comfortable long runs and easy daily training at slower paces.
-
"noticeably more spacious up front" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The reviewers describe the Superblast 3 as a meaningful step forward from v2 — softer step-in, more forefoot bounce, lighter weight, and a roomier upper while preserving the stable, plateless 'Swiss Army knife' identity that defined the line.
Best for: Versatile daily trainer and long-run shoe for runners who want max-cushion bounce without a plate; works well from easy shuffling paces through moderate efforts.
-
"controlled ride" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: An exceptionally versatile, proven stable-neutral high-stack trainer that delivers strong value through durability and breadth of use.
Best for: A highly versatile stable-neutral trainer that handles easy runs, long runs, workouts, and even half-marathon racing at moderate efforts.
-
"really nice basic comfortable fit" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Walkers and standers who want strong medial arch support and a grounded, stable feel
-
"a lot firmer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A heavier, firmer, more rigid take on the Glycerin GTS that shifts toward motion-control feel; reviewer misses the softer v22 midsole and finds v23 clunky for his mechanics.
Best for: Runners wanting rigid heel/midfoot stability without a medial post feel; not compatible with orthotics.
-
"the Pro feels the softest of the three" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea finds the Pro soft, responsive, and extremely versatile — she uses it at everything from 5K pace to marathon-pace long runs — but sees it as a training-performance shoe rather than her racer.
Best for: Marathon and half-marathon racing plus versatile training paces; works as a training-performance shoe more than a pure racer.
-
"a little bit on the firmer end" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A really solid update that firms up the midsole just enough to add stability and extends the shoe to longer miles, with a much-improved upper and heel lockdown.
Best for: Neutral runners wanting a workhorse daily trainer with some structure for longer miles
-
"softer and more flexible ride" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A major departure for the Rider line — softer, lighter, and more versatile, losing the stable-neutral character but gaining bounce and pace range; Matt recommends careful transition due to the lower drop and greater ankle range of motion.
Best for: Neutral runners who want a softer, more flexible, versatile daily trainer that can handle uptempo work and even non-super-shoe marathon racing.
-
"feels a lot snappier underfoot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A completely redirected 1080 that is lighter, bouncier, and more run-focused than v14, best for higher-volume feet wanting a responsive premium neutral daily trainer.
Best for: Runners wanting the lightest premium neutral daily trainer with bouncy cushioning, higher-volume uppers, and some pace versatility
-
"lighter and more responsive feel" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A lighter, snappier, more versatile 1080 that trades traditional soft maximalism for responsiveness, though stability suffers.
Best for: Runners wanting a light, responsive premium neutral trainer with some versatility for light workouts.
-
"really stable neutral rocker" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, stable, rockered maximal daily trainer that rolls comfortably for long easy miles and walking, but isn't built for speed.
Best for: Runners wanting a stable, rockered maximal-feeling trainer for long easy miles, standing, and walking.
-
"softer, bouncier over in version five" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt says v5 is a bigger update than the spec sheet suggests — softer, bouncier, more flexible and more secure fit — a polarizing evolution that some Rebel fans will love and others will not.
Best for: Runners who want a softer, bouncier lightweight trainer with more secure lockdown
-
"Snappy and actually has some flexibility" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt says the Rebel v4 and Mach 6 are both great versatile lightweight trainers — the v4 wins if you want bounce, softness and a wider accommodating fit without sidewalls.
Best for: Runners wanting a lightweight, bouncy, softer performance trainer that can do anything from easy to fast; works for wider feet and people who don't like sidewalls
-
"closer to the ground feel" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt says the v4 is the lighter, lower-to-the-ground, snappier option — great if you want that traditional Rebel feel and don't mind the outsole shredding.
Best for: Runners who want a closer-to-the-ground, lighter, snappier ride with more forefoot room
-
"Version 3 is firmer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, more rockered run-walk shoe that excels for easy jogging and all-day walking but is not suited for fast running; the upper is much improved over v2.
Best for: Easy daily miles, long days on feet, and walking/run-walk use rather than fast running.
-
"firmest of all of these options" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dave positions the Cloudmonster 3 as a structured, firm, rockered daily trainer best suited to easy shuffling paces and lifestyle crossover, noting meaningful upper improvements over the v2.
Best for: Daily easy miles and lifestyle crossover use for runners who want a structured, firm, cushioned On experience.
-
"definitely feels like it wants to run" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dave sees the Cloudmonster 3 Hyper as the pick for a pure running experience in the lineup, offering a lighter, springier ride than the standard Cloudmonster 3 while keeping a structured, rockered feel.
Best for: A pure running-focused structured daily trainer for runners who like a firmer super-foam ride with an aggressive rocker.
-
"borderline a stability shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Closest thing to a stability racing shoe available — unexpectedly versatile, very light, and durable, though expensive and unforgiving for easy runs or narrow/wide feet.
Best for: Runners with medial stability needs seeking a fast, lightweight trainer-racer for tempo, long runs, and half marathon+ racing
-
"really light, it's lively" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dave is a fan of the LightSpray version, calling it the weird but lively member of the lineup whose 2 oz weight drop unlocks meaningful versatility on top of the Hyper's structured rocker platform.
Best for: Runners who want a very light, structured max-stack trainer that can flex into long runs or even recreational racing duty, if they can stomach the price and limited release.
-
"a little bit stiffer and snappier" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, snappier, more stable high-stack daily trainer that works across the pace spectrum and offers rare mild stability for runners who want structure without a traditional stability shoe.
Best for: Runners wanting a firmer, snappier, highly cushioned daily trainer with mild stability, usable across easy, long, and uptempo runs, and even workouts/racing for those with mild stability needs.
-
Doctors of Running notes: A competitive, versatile daily trainer built on the Endorphin Elite 1 last that delivers a firm bounce on the forefoot rocker and good value at $150.
Best for: Versatile daily trainer and long run shoe for neutral runners who prefer a firmer, responsive ride.
-
"teeny bit more snappy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A mild stability shoe that's fine for easy runs and walking; slightly snappier than v19 and likely the better value on sale.
-
"soft and bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's favorite 2026 stability shoe; rare soft-bouncy super foam paired with a strong medial post.
Best for: Long runs and marathon-pace efforts for overpronators wanting a bouncy medially-posted trainer.
-
Best for: Walkers and standers with wider feet or bunion/toe-alignment concerns who want mild heel-to-midfoot support with an anatomic toe box
Road racing 51
-
"firmer, snappier feel" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, snappier lightweight versatile trainer with a prominent forefoot rocker and PEBA-based midsole, designed to roll the runner efficiently off the forefoot.
-
"once I got up to speed, I'm like, oh, this is really good" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Strong pick for heel-striker marathoners; reviewers split — one couldn't get the Fast-R 3 to work but loves the DNE 4. Puma is intentionally splitting their racing line for different mechanics rather than trying to make one shoe for everyone.
Best for: Heel-striker marathoners who want a less aggressive super shoe than the Fast-R Nitro Elite — diversification of Puma's racing line
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's first Deviate Nitro Elite he's actually liked since v1 — comes alive at tempo paces, less stiff than v3, bouncier and more aggressive without being overly stiff. Not meant for easy runs.
Best for: Heel landers picking up the pace at tempo and race efforts
-
"stupidly light" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: After a slow start requiring 40-50 miles of break-in, the Metaspeed Edge Tokyo became one of the reviewer's top racing shoes of 2025. The midsole gets bouncier and more responsive with wear, outsole durability is excellent at 100 miles, but the upper lacks security and can be harsh on skin without proper socks. Best suited for 5K to half marathon distances.
Best for: 5K to half marathon racing and speed workouts for intermediate to advanced runners who can tolerate a lighter, less structured shoe
-
"the most rockered ride" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Runners wanting a rolling, highly-rockered racer for 10K to marathon
-
"the softest of all of these shoes" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Forefoot-friendly runners with healthy Achilles/calves who want soft + ultra-light
-
"the most accessible" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Runners wanting one lightweight super shoe that covers easy through race day — especially those new to carbon
-
"really propels you forward" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's current favorite and preferred race shoe of the five — best price in the group at $250, and the best match for heel-/midfoot-striking runners who want to go fast.
-
"the fastest of the fast" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Forefoot-striking neutral runners with no stability needs, chasing all-out pace
-
"just slow down in the Pure" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: David's honorable mention — a surprisingly stable, very light and responsive fast-day option that he says he could race a half-marathon in.
-
"firm, but it's very snappy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea's #3 shoe of 2026 so far and one of her favorite racing shoes tested this year — the first comfortable Deviate Nitro Elite for her foot shape, with a firm-but-snappy ride that reminds her of the New Balance SC Elite v3.
-
"this shoe really comes alive once you pick up the pace" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A top-tier 10k/half racer at 4.5oz — incredibly light, very bouncy, very soft, but the compliant foam runs unstable for anyone with stability needs and on sharp turns.
Best for: Neutral-mechanics runners racing 10k to half marathon (some can manage marathon); track-spike weight feel with World-Athletics-legal stack
-
"this thing just really flies" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Patience-rewarding racer; once the midsole breaks in, it's a phenomenal carbon option for the price/weight.
-
"so much softer and bouncier" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A massive upgrade over v10 that moves the Takumi Sen into true moderate-stack super shoe territory with a much softer, bouncier Lightstrike Pro and better stability, making it more enjoyable for intervals, tempo runs, and racing.
Best for: Shorter-distance racing and speed work (10K and under for most runners, potentially up to marathon for elite runners) where a bouncy, moderate-stack super shoe feel is preferred.
-
"softest thing on the market" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: An ultra-soft, bouncy super shoe that requires very good ankle and hip stability; better suited to longer efforts than short fast racing, and not stable enough for the reviewer to race in.
Best for: Runners with stable mechanics and narrower feet who want the softest possible shoe for longer distance workouts and races
-
"really both firm and bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A stable-neutral super shoe with a firm-yet-bouncy dual-layer PEBA midsole and winged carbon plate that Matt considers a potential racing shoe of the year for runners who need medial guidance, while Andrea finds it comfortable and well-designed but biomechanically unsuitable for her push-off pattern; durability of the exposed midsole and outsole is a concern after only 20-25 miles.
Best for: Neutral runners who need some medial guidance or stability in a super shoe; 5K to marathon distances.
-
Doctors of Running notes: The Rocket X 3 is lighter, smoother, and more stable in the forefoot than v2 while preserving the rare stable-neutral racing profile, making it one of the top stable-neutral racing shoes on the market.
Best for: Marathon racing for runners who want a stable neutral super shoe and like getting up on their toes.
-
"ever so slightly more spacious" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The Metaspeed Edge Tokyo keeps the familiar Edge geometry with a slightly more spacious forefoot and a wider heel platform, paired with a notably bouncier forefoot foam than the Paris.
-
"really bouncy and plush forefoot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dave's pick of the pair — a very light, very responsive racer whose structured heel and explosive forefoot suit his mechanics from 5K up to the marathon.
Best for: Runners who want a stable, structured heel with a lively, bouncy forefoot toe-off for 5K through marathon racing
-
"really feel like a trampoline" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A very light, highly responsive super shoe with a soft, trampoline-like heel and firmer forefoot that Dave finds best suited to stride runners, though he personally needs more heel structure and prefers the Edge Tokyo.
Best for: Stride-style runners who want maximum heel bounce for 5K up to marathon racing
-
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea's hands-down favorite shoe ever for the road mile distance — used it for two PR mile races (4:59 and 5:20) on consecutive days. Versatile from mile up to 5K for non-spike racers, but watch for traction issues on wet surfaces.
Best for: Mile to 5K road races for forefoot/midfoot strikers who don't want to race in spikes.
-
"snugger and a lot lower volume" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A noticeably lighter, snappier evolution of the Vaporfly with great ZoomX ride and aggressive rocker, but the snugger lower-volume upper and reduced outsole rubber make it best suited for 5K-10K rather than half/marathon distances; fit issues may force runners to size up.
Best for: Shorter road racing (5K-10K) for runners whose feet fit the snugger upper
-
"the magic doesn't happen at slower paces" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A brilliantly fast, ultralight racer with a much more rideable v2 — but with strict speed, mechanics, and budget requirements. Recreational runners are better served by the Adios Pro 4 or Evo SL at half the price.
Best for: Elite and sub-elite runners racing 10K to marathon at sub-6:30 pace with neutral mechanics and healthy calves/toe-flexors. Not worth it for recreational runners.
-
"very responsive through the forefoot" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Runners who want a more stable heel with a bouncy forefoot, especially for 5K and 10K paces or races with lots of turns/track work.
-
"definitely a little wilder, more unstable" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Runners who want a softer, trampoline-like heel feel and prefer to settle into rhythm at half marathon and marathon paces.
-
"ready to rip and go fast" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: An aggressive, lively race shoe that returns to the original Vaporfly's roots — best suited for 5K to half marathon, with enough cushion for a marathon but a narrow midfoot platform that won't suit runners with stability needs.
Best for: 5K to half marathon racing for neutral runners; enough cushion for a marathon if the platform suits you
-
Doctors of Running notes: On's best super shoe yet — bouncy, durable, well-balanced for 10K-marathon racing; competes with Alphafly and Endorphin Elite 2 in the upper echelon, though the narrow heel limits it for runners who fatigue on stability at longer distances.
Best for: Half-marathon to marathon racing for neutral runners with stable mechanics who want a bouncy, propulsive super shoe.
-
"really rhythmic and really smooth" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dr. Salus picks Elite 2 over Elite 1 for its better outsole, improved traction and extra bounce; Dr. Klein prefers Elite 1 because v2's narrower platform creates too much heel instability for him.
-
"the bounciest and most insane thing" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: An outrageously bouncy racer that is better for longer steady efforts than short intervals and is only suitable for runners with strong neutral mechanics due to its instability.
Best for: Longer-distance racing (half marathon and above) for runners with truly neutral mechanics who want maximum bounce
-
"way more aggressive" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A more aggressive, very durable super shoe with great initial bounce that softens over time; excellent for fast forefoot strikers doing tempos to marathons, but not for runners needing stability or a lasting snappy feel.
Best for: Fast runners doing tempos, 10K up to marathon efforts, especially forefoot strikers who want durable super shoe mileage.
-
"almost feels like a trampoline" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A stiff, bouncy trampoline-like super shoe with a snappy, explosive forefoot, well-suited to runners who want a structured and more aggressive racing feel.
Best for: Racing at shorter, faster paces like 5K where the stiff, snappy forefoot shines, though still strong at any distance
-
Doctors of Running notes: A softer, more controlled carbon racer with a gradual transition and a surprisingly cushioned forefoot, particularly well-suited to rhythmic half marathon and marathon efforts.
Best for: Controlled uptempo efforts at half marathon and marathon pace where the soft, rhythmic ride and forefoot cushion shine
-
"way bouncier and way more aggressive" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A lighter, bouncier, more aggressive super shoe that comes alive at faster paces but loses some midfoot stability and versatility compared to v3.
Best for: Faster runners with long strides who can open up hips and toe off hard; workouts and race paces at 5K-marathon effort
-
"I really only like running fast in it" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A super shoe that shines at the 5K end and the marathon end of the spectrum, but struggles at half-marathon pace — both reviewers ultimately agreed it suits fast 5K running and steady marathon efforts.
Best for: 5K racing at fast paces or marathon racing at steady effort; not ideal for half-marathon / tempo paces in between
-
"longer distance racing shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A durable, stable-neutral super shoe that is excellent at 5K pace and marathon effort but feels awkward at the half-marathon/tempo paces in between; the slightly softer, heavier evolution of the Pro 3.
Best for: Stable-neutral runners wanting a durable super shoe for 5K fast efforts or steady marathon pacing; forefoot strikers especially benefit from the stiff forefoot
-
Doctors of Running notes: A unique race shoe that uses the insert itself to shape the plate profile, giving a firm but propulsive ride; worked well for a 10K race and feels capable up to half marathon.
Best for: Race distances from 10K to half marathon for neutral runners who like a firm, propulsive feel
-
"this is more the true Marathon racer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A more versatile and stable update that handles marathon to easy paces better than the Pro 3, though it loses some of the Pro 3's pop for very fast efforts.
Best for: True marathon racing and longer distances at easier efforts
-
Doctors of Running notes: A smooth-rolling soft racer that excels at easy to marathon paces for long runs and comfortable racing, but lacks the stability or the top-end speed of the Endorphin Pro 4.
Best for: Comfortable marathon racing and long runs at easy to marathon effort
-
"not the most aggressive super shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A comfortable but firmer-feeling super shoe with more versatility into faster paces than the SC Elite v4; works well for a runner who wants to push marathon pace with mild stability support.
Best for: Marathon to half marathon racing, particularly for runners needing a touch of guidance from sidewalls
-
"great 5K 10K racer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A polarizing update where the same shoe can feel like a short-course speedster or a marathon cruiser depending on the runner's landing pattern, toe/MTP geometry, and pace needs — both testers like it for different reasons.
Best for: Depends heavily on runner mechanics — Andrea (midfoot lander) loves it for fast short races, Matt (heel striker) prefers it for marathon pace; likely better for higher-volume feet
-
"true Super Shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's favorite Altra racing shoe and one of his top racers of the year — durability, plate, foam, and fit are all meaningfully improved over v1, though $260 is still steep.
Best for: Runners who want an anatomic, zero-drop super shoe for racing — especially those with calf/ankle strength to handle zero drop at speed
-
"trampoline effect" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: One of David's two favorite current racing super shoes; shines from 10K down and for faster, more aggressive turnover, but requires some self-discipline to control the bounce.
Best for: Runners who want an aggressive bouncy forefoot toe-off and are racing 10K down to marathon, with enough control to harness the bounce.
-
Doctors of Running notes: One of David's two favorite current racing shoes; particularly strong at half marathon and marathon paces where its predictable rocker lets you fall into rhythm.
Best for: Marathon and half marathon racers who want to lock into rhythm with a predictable, rockered ride.
-
Doctors of Running notes: A versatile, very comfortable super shoe that performs well from mile pace to marathon pace; its main limitation as a racer is its weight, which holds it back at shorter distances.
Best for: A do-it-all super shoe for workouts and marathon racing for runners who don't mind the extra weight.
-
"more aggressive ride" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea's fast racer of choice from 5K to half marathon; the aggressive forefoot and Air Pod placement reward faster paces more than marathon efforts.
Best for: Lateral midfoot strikers racing 5K through half marathon who can control a very aggressive, bouncy forefoot.
-
"way more aggressive than the prior versions" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt considers it a much more aggressive and faster-feeling Alphafly than prior versions, worth the $275 for runners who will actually race it fast — but a poor choice for easy runs or more moderate paces.
Best for: Faster runners racing or doing fast workouts who want a very aggressive, forward-directed super shoe.
-
"feel very stiff in every direction" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea sees the Elite as the longer-distance sibling of the Pure: stiffer, more responsive, and most at home at half-marathon to marathon pace.
Best for: Half to full marathon racing; Mizuno reports ~70% of its sponsored athletes pick Elite for longer distances.
-
"Crazy light" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea is highly impressed with the Pure, calling out its unbelievably light weight, stable feel on tight turns, and smooth ride from 5K pace up through marathon-pace long runs.
Best for: 5K to half marathon pace work; the reviewer also found it strong for a 10-mile marathon-pace run.
-
"one of the most comfortable super shoes" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Not the fastest super shoe on the market, but one of the most comfortable — a versatile, durable PEBA racer Matt would grab for a marathon tomorrow and a contender for super shoe of the year.
Best for: Comfortable super shoe for half marathon and marathon distances, recreational runners, and first-time super-shoe buyers wanting long-run comfort over top-end speed.
-
"much firmer ride in version five" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, faster, more aggressive super racer than the Pro 4 that shines at 5K to half marathon pace but loses the full-length stable-neutral feel and comfort for easy or marathon-distance running.
Best for: Faster workouts and shorter racing (5K to half marathon) for neutral runners without medial forefoot stability needs who want an aggressive, firm, snappy ride.
-
"more of a comfortable super racer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A comfortable, stable-neutral super racer best for longer race distances, favored for its softer ride and accommodating upper even though it lacks outright top-end snap.
Best for: Runners wanting a stable-neutral super racer for marathon and half-marathon distances with a softer, more comfortable ride.
Easy / recovery 41
-
"very soft underfoot, very plush" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A very soft and plush trainer with a balanced rocker geometry, best suited for slow, easy paces rather than faster workouts.
-
"a really rolling ride" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A much-improved version 2 that drops weight and softness for a firmer, more stable and runnable rolling ride; excellent for long runs and ultras but not a fast shoe, and held back by a narrow tapered forefoot.
Best for: Long runs and ultramarathons on the road, plus easy/recovery/daily miles for runners who want a lot of foam; a potential marathon shoe for 3:30-4:00 runners
-
"really nice upgrade on the original version" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Strong v2 upgrade — addresses v1's weight and density without sacrificing structure; held back from broader recommendation by Hoka's persistent tapered forefoot.
Best for: Long-mileage training shoe for runners with wider forefoot or who can tolerate Hoka's classic taper
-
"the best distance shoe of the group" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Picked as the stability winner of the group and the best long-distance shoe — a viable max-cushion stability option for runners who'd otherwise pick a Gaviota.
Best for: Long-run hammering at consistent paces for runners with mild-to-moderate stability needs who want a super-foam ride
-
"very soft underfoot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The most affordable and softest of the three New Balance neutral trainers, the Ellipse offers a compliant cushioned ride ideal for easy runs and walking, though it lacks the responsiveness and durability of the 1080 or the structure of the 880.
Best for: Runners wanting a soft, affordable easy day shoe or casual walking shoe
-
"great for easy miles" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea's honorable mention — a comfortable 4 mm drop easy-day and standing/walking shoe that marks Altra's return to a roomier fit and a more agreeable midsole compound; not a shoe for picking up the pace.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's shoe of the year for 2025 — a plush, wide, stable-neutral daily trainer that's slightly lighter and more responsive than the GT-4000 4, better for picking up the pace but less aggressively supportive.
Best for: Runners who want a max-cushioned, stable-neutral daily trainer with modern guidance-based stability (rather than a medial post) for easy and long runs.
-
"great for easy runs, for long runs" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A more durable, balanced successor to v1 that ages well — excels for long distance, Achilles recovery, and runners needing forefoot guidance; expensive at $200 but the longevity helps justify it.
Best for: Long runs, long race efforts, Achilles sensitivities, wide-footed runners who need a durable max-cushion super trainer
-
"more manageable package" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: What they hoped the Vomero would be. Effort is showing in Nike's trainers, not just racers.
-
"definitely the bounciest" — Doctors of Running
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's top stability shoe of 2025 and possibly his top training shoe overall — full-length medial stability, the first 8mm drop in the Kayano's 30-year history, and a resilient bouncy 4D guidance system.
Best for: Long runs, easy runs, and all-day standing for runners who need full-length medial stability with bounce
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt's stability shoe of the year so far — a comfortable, softer, smooth-transitioning easy/long-run stability trainer with consistent full-length medial support, though too heavy for faster workouts.
Best for: Easy runs and long runs for runners who want a soft, relaxed ride with aggressive medial stability and a smooth heel transition.
-
"softer and much smoother" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A notably improved update moving the Ghost Max line back toward the original version one — softer, smoother transitions, more roomy, and better stable-neutral guidance.
Best for: Walkers and slower runners who want a soft, cushioned, orthotic-friendly max-stack shoe with mild medial guidance.
-
"much lighter" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A much lighter, softer, bouncier take on the Hurricane that stands out as the only super-foam premium stability option, though the softness can feel mushy and the lateral bias won't suit everyone.
Best for: Runners wanting a bouncy, soft, mild-to-moderate stability shoe with some versatility into faster paces.
-
"a little bit more snug" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Matt calls this the best and most runnable Kayano he has ever tested, praising the smoother transition, slightly firmer snappy ride, and improved full-length guidance — only real gripe is premature outsole wear.
Best for: Runners needing medial stability who want a premium stability shoe that can also pick up the pace; long-time Kayano wearers looking for a more runnable, less clunky version.
-
"smoother heel transition" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A smoother, lighter-feeling update with a first-ever 8mm drop and a moderate stable-neutral ride that guides without feeling posted; battling the Glycerin GTS 22 for Matt's stability shoe of the year.
Best for: Runners wanting a smoother heel transition, slightly lower drop, more forefoot cushioning, a stiffer forefoot (helpful for hallux limitus / toe mobility issues), or who are sensitive to arch pressure and prefer moderate guidance over a medial post.
-
"still has medial posting going on" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, bouncier update that feels lighter than its weight thanks to DNA Tuned break-in and delivers higher stability via a medial post; battling the Kayano 32 for Matt's stability shoe of the year and a clear improvement over the previous, too-soft version.
Best for: Runners who want a bouncier heel, a higher heel drop, a more flexible forefoot, and who like the feeling of a medial post with pressure under the arch — higher-stability needs than a stable-neutral trainer.
-
"more stable but also a little bit firmer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, more secure, and noticeably more stable iteration that returns the Glycerin GTS to its premium stability roots; better for runners wanting real stability but may over-correct pronation for some.
Best for: Runners who found v21 too soft or wanted more stability/control from a premium stability trainer
-
"very different than Nimbus 26 and 25" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dr. Klein prefers the Nimbus 27 over the Diadora Cellula — the foam change made it firmer and more resilient, what he wished the Cumulus could be.
-
"genuinely more plush than the Clifton" — Doctors of Running
-
"rocker platform is much more prominent" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Preferred over the Neo Zen by Dr. Brown and Dr. Klein for its bouncy resilient ride, better heel construction, and versatility for both daily training and faster work.
-
"more plush" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A good continuation of the Bondi line — more plush, slightly lighter, with a softer super critical EVA ride and more differentiation from the Clifton.
Best for: Runners wanting a plush, stable max-cushion neutral trainer for easy miles
-
"this shoe is a Max stack shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A plush, max-stack daily trainer that trades responsiveness for cushion and a rolling rocker — aimed at easy mileage and long runs rather than speed work.
Best for: Plush daily mileage, long runs, and easy shuffling efforts
-
"rolling sensation especially off the front" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: An aggressively rockered, compliant trainer that excels at creating a rolling sensation off the forefoot, best for runners who want a low-drop feel on easy and long efforts.
Best for: Runners wanting an aggressive forefoot rocker and low-drop feel for easy and efficient longer runs.
-
"more comfortable at Daily paces" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Derek is very impressed after initial miles — the GlideRide Max delivers a softer, bouncier, more natural toe-off than previous GlideRides while staying stable, and he sees it as a top contender in the max-cushion category.
Best for: Max-cushion daily mileage and long runs at easy to rhythmic paces on road or runnable dirt.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Better suited to easy and slow paces than the Cloudmonster 2; more comfortable upper but less stable and less versatile across paces.
Best for: Easy paces, recovery jogs, walking — runners who want maximum cushion in a neutral setup.
-
Doctors of Running notes: On's first truly maximalist shoe lands well — extremely cushioned, light for the stack, and a great mileage shoe for neutral runners.
Best for: High-mileage easy days, long runs, recovery — for neutral runners who want maximum cushion.
-
"a little bit more bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Walkers and standers with mild stability needs who want a softer, bouncier ride with full-length guidance
-
"really, really pleasant shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Soft, plush, stable premium daily trainer best for easy and long runs; heavier but smooth.
Best for: Easy runs, long runs, recovery for neutral runners wanting soft premium cushion
-
"completely different shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A lighter, firmer, snappier shoe that feels closer to a Nimbus Lite hybrid; more versatile but loses the plush premium feel.
Best for: Versatile daily training and uptempo miles for runners who want a snappier, firmer Nimbus
-
"felt really mushy and too soft underfoot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A softer, heavier, max-stack rocker trainer the reviewer did not get along with, partly due to a possible medial pitch in the upper; fine for buyers who want a plusher, wider fit and won't notice the weight.
-
"an ounce lighter at 9.6 ounces" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A meaningful upgrade over v1: lighter, more stable, firmer with a more apparent rocker; the reviewer prefers it despite the $170 price.
Best for: Runners wanting a moderately rockered, max-stack trainer that is lighter and more stable than v1.
-
"the foam does break in really nicely" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The softer, more traditional-feeling Glycerin GTS that the reviewer prefers over v23, especially on sale, for its cushier midsole and clearer medial support.
Best for: Runners who want a softer stability ride with a clear medial post feel and narrower fit.
-
"max stack training shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A meaningful improvement over the original Glycerin Max for runners who prefer a firmer, more structured ride; the sharp forefoot rocker masks the weight and feels great on long runs, though the heel transition may not suit everyone.
Best for: Neutral runners wanting a protective max-stack trainer with a pronounced forefoot rocker for longer efforts
-
"a tank of a shoe" — Doctors of Running
Best for: Walkers and standers who want a firm, very stable, durable shoe with pronounced medial support and don't mind a heavier weight
-
"this is not a stability shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A polarizing but highly durable, bouncy high-drop daily trainer that delivers what many hoped the Vomero 18 would be. Great for neutral runners who want a plush, chunky ZoomX long-run and daily option, but wrong for anyone wanting a wide toe box, low drop, or stability.
Best for: Neutral runners who want a high-drop, chunky-heeled, bouncy daily trainer for easy miles, long runs, and some uptempo work — especially those offloading the Achilles or wanting an alternative to super shoes.
-
"Version 3 is a better running shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A heavier, taller, markedly more stable redesign that is the better running shoe of the two thanks to improved rocker, durability, and transitions — but its narrower, over-padded upper and strong lateral bias won't suit everyone.
Best for: Runners wanting a firmer, moderately stable daily/easy trainer or a walking shoe, especially those with medial instability who do not have lateral ankle issues.
-
"mild to moderate stability shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A comfortable, stable, spacious-upper daily trainer that transitions smoothly but feels heavy and lifeless underfoot; best for easy running and walking, not speed.
Best for: Mild to moderate stability runners using it for easy daily miles, walking, and all-day standing comfort.
-
"a lot softer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Softer, smoother, and more durable than v18 but notably heavier and less responsive; most buyers can save money and grab v18 on sale instead.
Best for: Walkers and new/easy-pace runners who want a mild stability shoe with a high-arch feel
-
"the Guide 19 wins" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Straightforward firmer mild-stability trainer and the group's best walking shoe.
Best for: Runners wanting a simple non-super-foam mild stability shoe and walkability.
-
"didn't find the Hurricane to be as bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Mild stability trainer for runners who dislike medial posts and want lower volume.
Speed work 20
-
"the major hype shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A very good, hyped do-it-all shoe with balanced Lightstrike Pro bounce and the roomiest, softest-heeled fit of the group, held back by midfoot medial instability and early outsole wear around 80 miles.
Best for: Wider or higher-volume feet wanting a bouncy, flexible non-plated trainer that can also race, especially runners who dislike medial stability or have heel sensitivity.
-
"super bottomheavy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Nate found the Sonicblast firm, stiff, and clunky compared to the Megablast. While he eventually settled into its rhythm after 5 miles, it did not click for him on the first run and he noted it would suit runners who specifically prefer late-stage rocker geometry.
Best for: Runners who prefer structured, late-stage rocker trainers and don't mind a firmer, stiffer ride
-
"likes to go fast" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The reviewer finds the Sonicblast excels at faster paces with an impressively bouncy and snappy forefoot, but notes the heel-to-midfoot transition is somewhat rigid and jarring at easy paces, suggesting refinements could be made to the bevel and plate length.
Best for: Uptempo long runs and speed training where a bouncy, snappy forefoot feel is desired
-
"snappy, bouncy off the foot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Excellent versatile lightweight trainer at $150 — softer and more versatile at faster paces than the Maverick, with a great soft upper, but the narrow midfoot limits stability for longer efforts.
Best for: Bouncy uptempo daily training and as a super-shoe alternative for runners who don't gel with carbon-plated racers
-
"so much faster on the forefoot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A forefoot-focused tempo shoe with real potential but an underdeveloped heel — Solless would pick it as a do-it-all racer, Nathan and Klein still prefer the Novablast 5 or other $180 options.
Best for: Uptempo long runs and 5K-to-half racing for runners who land and roll off the forefoot.
-
"softer than the previous version" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A snappier, more performance-oriented lightweight trainer/racer with a rolling geometry and mild rearfoot medial guidance, best suited for workouts, long runs, and racing.
Best for: Long runs, workouts, and race day — and runners needing mild medial guidance in the rearfoot
-
"feels more comfortable at easier paces" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: V5 trades some of V4's stiffness and top-end speed for smoother transitions, more forefoot flexibility, a wider upper and mild medial heel guidance — making it a more versatile easier-going shoe that works for more runners, especially those needing subtle medial support.
Best for: Runners who want a versatile workout/daily/long-run shoe with mild medial guidance and a wider, more forgiving fit — and who don't need top-end race-pace snap.
-
"very snug up front on the toe box" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A plush, rhythmic ZoomX super-trainer that shines on long runs and long tempos for marathon training; the reviewer's pick for a marathon season.
Best for: Marathon-block long runs and longer tempo efforts where a plush, rhythmic, road-mile-eating super-trainer is preferred
-
"much softer and a little bit more comfortable" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: An excellent, much-improved versatile lightweight trainer that's softer, stiffer and better at easy paces than the Boston, with a wider anatomic but lower-volume fit and neutral non-biased guidance.
Best for: Runners who want a versatile lightweight trainer that handles easy days well, with a wider anatomic toe box and neutral guidance — and an alternative to aggressive super shoes
-
"this is not a turbo this is a Pegasus plus" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A versatile non-plated alternative for neutral runners — works for both workouts and daily runs — but not the responsive speed-shoe its Turbo lineage suggests. Pick the Plus over the 41 if you want versatility and a lighter shoe.
Best for: Neutral-mechanics runners who want one versatile Nike shoe for daily training and workouts and don't need stability features.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt frames the Magic Speed 4 as the firmer, snappier, more racing-leaning sibling to the Endorphin Speed 4 — better for short-to-moderate fast efforts but less suited to long runs.
Best for: Shorter, faster workouts and 10K-to-half-marathon racing; works for marathon training when you want a snappier tempo shoe.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt frames the Magic Speed 4 as a much more trainer-friendly evolution of the Magic Speed 3 — more versatile and roomier but less aggressive at top-end paces.
Best for: Plated performance trainer for tempo, half-marathon training/racing, and even some easy runs once broken in.
-
Doctors of Running notes: David characterizes the Cyclone 2 as the closest thing Topo has to a super-shoe — light, fast, full-Pebax, and remarkably versatile across track, tempo, and daily mileage.
Best for: A versatile Swiss-army-knife lightweight trainer marketed as a daily but capable of track workouts, hill repeats, longer tempos, and long runs — David prefers it for the speedy stuff.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Andrea's favorite non-plated performance trainer of the past several years — a versatile uptempo shoe that hits the sweet spot of Pebax cushion plus low-stack stability, with strong outsole durability for the price.
Best for: Faster workouts (mile-pace intervals through threshold) for midfoot strikers who like low drop, anatomical toe box, late toe spring, and a flexible forefoot. Excellent rain traction.
-
"ridiculously cushioned" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Nathan's stride didn't mesh with the Sonic Blast's rocker and soft forefoot at easy paces, but he acknowledges it's a lively, stable plated daily trainer that works well for other testers on his team.
Best for: Nova Blast fans who want a snappier, plated daily trainer with some structure, or runners wanting to experiment with plates before going carbon.
-
"really nice and bouncy" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: The reviewer prefers it as the better long-run/long-race option of the two, with a smoother transition once broken in and a bouncier, more stable ride.
Best for: Long-run and long-race training for neutral runners wanting a plated trainer that feels like a toned-down Alphafly, with wider toe box.
-
"lightweight, very versatile trainer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A lightweight, versatile daily trainer at $170 that can do a bit of everything, but its very stiff forefoot plate makes it polarizing — great if the rocker lines up with your metatarsal heads, problematic if not.
Best for: Neutral runners wanting a lightweight, versatile do-it-all trainer whose mechanics align with a stiff forefoot rocker.
-
"stiffer and snappier" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: An excellent stiff, snappy carbon-plated trainer whose forefoot stiffness holds up over miles, best for runners whose toe joints line up with its rocker.
Best for: Runners wanting a stiff, snappy carbon-plated trainer for workouts and tempo, especially those with narrower feet or higher insteps.
-
"softer with a little smoother foroot transition" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A softer, smoother lightweight trainer whose plate and longer rocker make it feel better for long runs, though it is less stable and less snappy than the Azura.
Best for: Runners who want a softer, smoother lightweight trainer for long runs, uptempo and easy days, especially those with normal to wider feet.
-
"soft and bouncy under foot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A soft, unofficially stability-biased super trainer that works well for medial-stability needs and higher-volume feet, but suffers from a midsole that firms up quickly, poor outsole durability, and a pronounced lateral bias that won't suit everyone.
Best for: Runners needing medial stability with a higher-volume foot who want a soft ride and don't scuff outsoles heavily.
Long run 9
-
Doctors of Running notes: Matt prefers v3 over v2 if he had to race in one because the bouncier foam, better rocker and faster transition give it real pace versatility, but it gives up some of v2's medial stability and the durability is still TBD.
Best for: Long runs and uptempo efforts for neutral runners who want a bouncier, faster super-trainer than the Prime X 2.
-
"this medial cutout is not stable" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Brooks' first legitimate super trainer — DNA Gold and the nylon plate deliver a smooth, bouncy, versatile ride that has held up over 100 miles, but the medial midfoot cutout is unstable and the upper is heavier than it needs to be.
Best for: Uptempo long runs and versatile daily training for neutral runners with narrow feet
-
"really a true super trainer" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Reviewers disagreed sharply: one found the PEBA-dual-foam geometry versatile enough to handle easy runs, tempo, long runs, and even track work despite the weight; the other felt the heavy upper, padded heel, and insufficient medial cutout made it too heavy and uncomfortable compared to lighter super-trainers.
Best for: Recreational runners who want a max-cushion super-trainer that can double as a stable long-run or even marathon option
-
Doctors of Running notes: A more stable, stiffer, less-bouncy super trainer than v2 — better suited for uptempo training and marathon racing for average runners than for easy days, with great durability and improved guidance, but a finicky tapered toebox.
Best for: Uptempo runs, marathon-pace long runs, and a forgiving, durable marathon racer for runners who find the SC Elite v4 too aggressive.
-
Doctors of Running notes: A firmer, stiffer, more guided alternative to the Balos — better when you want plate-driven uptempo support and structure rather than a soft flexible cruiser.
Best for: Runners who want a stable, plated long-run/uptempo trainer with smooth rocker rather than a flexible, bouncier max-cushion cruiser.
-
Doctors of Running notes: v3 swings back toward training duty — firmer, more stable, more guided than v2's bouncy uptempo/racing personality; pick v3 if you want a stable plated trainer, v2 if you want a faster racy shoe.
Best for: A pure super-trainer for daily training and long runs, especially for runners with stiff toe joints who want a smooth rocker.
-
Best for: Marathon training and racing for runners who want the most cushion possible at faster paces, especially those with overpronation.
-
Doctors of Running notes: A soft, max-cushioned, stable-neutral super trainer better suited to relaxed long-run miles than fast workouts; the cushier and more centered of the two compared shoes.
Best for: Marathoners or road-ultra runners who want maximum cushion for long-distance training and racing.
-
Doctors of Running notes: Reviewer prefers the Balos to the 1080 v13 for being a touch more stable, bouncier, with wider midfoot and a more pronounced rocker — better for daily training and long runs at easy paces with a tiny bit of tempo, though not a workout shoe despite being marketed as faster.
Best for: Runners who want a wider, more stable, bouncier max-cushion daily/long-run shoe with a more apparent rocker than the 1080 v13.
trail ultra 2
-
"huge fan of this shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: Dave's front-runner for trail shoe of the year — a very balanced all-around trail shoe he'd lean toward for an ultra.
Best for: Long trail outings and ultras where you may walk a lot
-
"It's plush, but it's not overly hot" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: David's honorable mention — a wide, plush, well-priced trail shoe that he says has taken the place of the Speedgoat in his rotation.
trail light 1
-
"long distance Trail racing shoe" — Doctors of Running
Doctors of Running notes: A comfortable, smooth-transitioning long-distance trail racer that shines for half-marathon to ultra-marathon efforts on moderate terrain, but isn't suited for short fast races or technical mud/sand.
Best for: Long-distance trail racing, half marathon to ultra marathon distances on moderate trails