Ask the advisor
On Cloudmonster 3
Road Daily Trainer

On Cloudmonster 3

The Cloudmonster 3 improves substantially on the v2 upper and is very comfortable for walking and easy running, but at $190 it feels overpriced for what is essentially a firm daily trainer with a competitive performance ceiling. — Doctors of Running

from $189.95 at Road Runner Sports See all prices →
Physical blueprint

Where this shoe sits

Weight 295 g
Heel stack 40.0 mm
Drop 6.0 mm
Cushioning High

Best for

Daily TrainingRecovery & Easy
Suits Forefoot, Heel, Midfoot strikers
Pronation Neutral
Surface Road
Lifespan good mi

Specifications

Weight (M9)
295g (10.4 oz)
Stack (Heel)
40.0 mm
Stack (Forefoot)
34.0 mm
Drop
6.0 mm
Midsole
Helion (EVA/OBC) with triple CloudTec layers
Plate
Nylon (Embedded Speedboard)
Outsole
Rubber compound
Upper
Engineered mesh
Lacing
Traditional

Fit Profile

Length
True To Size
Forefoot Width
Standard
Lockdown
Good
Sizing
True To Size

Ride Characteristics

Cushioning
High
Feel
Firm Responsive
Energy Return
Moderate
Stability
Neutral
Rocker
Aggressive
Transition
Aggressive Forward
Bounce
Muted

Durability

Expected Miles
good
Outsole
Above Average

Expert reviews · 6 reviewers · grouped per channel

BI
Ben Is Running Youtube ↗

Ben's stability daily trainer pick — features a Speedboard plastic plate for side-to-side support and delivers a firm but well-rounded package.

Best for: Runners needing stability in a daily trainer

source
+1 earlier review from Ben Is Running

Returns to what made the original Cloudmonster great: a stable, comfortable, poppy daily trainer — the reviewer's pick of the two over the Hyper 3.

Best for: Stable daily-training miles, easy runs, and long runs — especially useful when coming back from a niggle.

62 miles tested · source
DO
Doctors of Running Youtube ↗

The Cloudmonster 3 improves substantially on the v2 upper and is very comfortable for walking and easy running, but at $190 it feels overpriced for what is essentially a firm daily trainer with a competitive performance ceiling.

Best for: Easy running, walking, and on-your-feet-all-day use; solid daily trainer for those who like firm Cloud ride

source
+2 earlier reviews from Doctors of Running

Dave positions the Cloudmonster 3 as a structured, firm, rockered daily trainer best suited to easy shuffling paces and lifestyle crossover, noting meaningful upper improvements over the v2.

Best for: Daily easy miles and lifestyle crossover use for runners who want a structured, firm, cushioned On experience.

source

A firmer, more rockered run-walk shoe that excels for easy jogging and all-day walking but is not suited for fast running; the upper is much improved over v2.

Best for: Easy daily miles, long days on feet, and walking/run-walk use rather than fast running.

50 miles tested · source
E
EDDBUD Youtube ↗

A refined, characterful daily trainer that leans responsive and stable rather than plush, working best at steady to tempo paces.

Best for: Daily to steady-pace running for runners who prefer responsive over squashy cushioning

source
FR
FORDY RUNS Youtube ↘

A dated, overpriced max-stack daily trainer whose EVA CloudTec tech no longer competes with modern foam rivals; one to avoid.

Best for: Easy aerobic miles or casual wear

source
RM
Run Moore Youtube ↑

A high-cushion performance trainer that outperforms expectations — the reviewer's favorite shoe so far this year thanks to its stiff, snappy feel with genuine long-run protection.

Best for: Runners who want a stiffer, high-cushion performance trainer that handles long easy days and track work alike; especially good for returning from minor injuries thanks to the stable ride.

source
TR
The Run Testers Youtube ↘

The Cloudmonster 3 is seen as outclassed in a very strong group and eliminated early, with reviewers noting it tried hard but couldn't compete with the other shoes.

source
+1 earlier review from The Run Testers

Not a hit for this reviewer — the CloudTec cushioning feels dated and weighty versus modern foams, delivering little energy return or protection at a price that has climbed to make the value proposition worse against cheaper, livelier alternatives.

Best for: Fans of classic On CloudTec cushioning and anyone who loved the Cloudmonster 2; otherwise hard to recommend given the competition.

28 miles tested · source

Frequently asked questions

How does the On Cloudmonster 3 fit?

Reviewers note: Upper is more spacious than version 2, fixing lace bite issues from the previous version

Per Doctors of Running.

How much does the On Cloudmonster 3 weigh and what is its drop?

The On Cloudmonster 3 weighs about 295g (men's 9), has a 40.0mm heel stack and a 6.0mm heel-toe drop.

What shoes is the On Cloudmonster 3 compared to?

Reviewers compare the On Cloudmonster 3 to On Cloudmonster 3 Hyper, ASICS Superblast 2, ASICS Novablast 5, On Cloudmonster 2.

Per Doctors of Running, Ben Is Running, FORDY RUNS, Run Moore, The Run Testers.

How many experts have reviewed the On Cloudmonster 3?

Next Pair aggregates 10 expert reviews of the On Cloudmonster 3, including Doctors of Running, Ben Is Running, FORDY RUNS.

Per Doctors of Running, Ben Is Running, FORDY RUNS.

Where it sits among similar shoes

Compared to other road daily trainer in the same lane.

Weight · lower = lighter Men's size 9
On Cloudmonster 3
295g
Kiprun Kipride Max
278g
Saucony Omni 23 ST 23
286g
Altra FWD Via 2
281g
Heel stack · higher = more cushioning mm
On Cloudmonster 3
40.0mm
Kiprun Kipride Max
44.0mm
Saucony Omni 23 ST 23
40.0mm
Altra FWD Via 2
37.0mm
Drop · higher = more heel-leaning mm
On Cloudmonster 3
6.0mm
Kiprun Kipride Max
6.0mm
Saucony Omni 23 ST 23
8.0mm
Altra FWD Via 2
4.0mm

Continue reading

Compare with

On Cloudmonster 3 vs ASICS Megablast
Side-by-side breakdown

Foam guide

How EVA foam works
Read the explainer

Similar shoes

Kiprun Kipride Max
278g · 6.0mm drop
Saucony Omni 23 ST 23
286g · 8.0mm drop
Altra FWD Via 2
281g · 4.0mm drop
Saucony Hurricane 25
295g · 6.0mm drop

On Cloudmonster 3

Data-driven recommendation backed by expert reviews.

Ask the advisor
Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized from named, linked sources — never copied verbatim. We weight clinical and lab-tested sources more heavily than community commentary, but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.
Last updated 2026-08-13