Puma MagMax Nitro 2
Road Daily Trainer

Puma MagMax Nitro 2

A versatile max-cushion trainer that balances plush protection with responsive Nitro foam and a stable platform, though reviewers split on whether it delivers enough bounce for faster paces or feels too soft and heavy for true versatility.

"lightweight and surprisingly nimble" — Ben Parkes
Physical blueprint

Where this shoe sits

Weight 266 g
Heel stack 46.0 mm
Drop 8.0 mm
Cushioning Maximal

Best for

Daily TrainingLong RunsRecovery & Easy
Suits Heel, Midfoot strikers
Pronation Neutral
Surface Road
Lifespan 500+ mi

Specifications

Weight (M9)
266g (9.4 oz)
Stack (Heel)
46.0 mm
Stack (Forefoot)
38.0 mm
Drop
8.0 mm
Midsole
NITROFOAM (nitrogen-infused supercritical PEBA)
Outsole
PUMAGRIP rubber
Upper
Engineered mesh with PWRTAPE
Lacing
Traditional

Fit Profile

Length
True To Size
Forefoot Width
Wide
Midfoot Width
Average
Heel Width
Average
Lockdown
Good
Toe Box
Wide
Sizing
True To Size

Ride Characteristics

Cushioning
Maximal
Feel
Balanced
Energy Return
Moderate
Stability
Neutral
Rocker
Mild
Transition
Smooth

Durability

Expected Miles
500+
Outsole
Excellent

Expert reviews · 7 reviewers · grouped per channel

BI
Believe in the Run Youtube

A versatile max cushion trainer that avoids feeling overly soft or heavy, offering responsive Nitro foam, a pronounced rocker, and excellent durability. Both reviewers gave it a green light, praising the comfortable knit upper, improved width, and ability to handle a range of paces.

Best for: Runners wanting a versatile max cushion trainer that can handle daily runs, long runs, and easy runs with the ability to pick up the pace when needed.

BP
Ben Parkes Youtube

A lighter, bouncier and slightly roomier evolution of v1 that nails its brief as a plush long-run mileage monster, though the GBP 170 RRP is a touch high versus competitors.

Best for: Long runs, easy mileage and marathon training for neutral or heavier runners who want a soft, durable mileage monster.

DO
Doctors of Running Youtube

A tall max-cushion trainer whose aggressive heel flare works well for some runners (midfoot strikers, Andrea) but clunks badly for others (heel strikers, Matt), illustrating that foot strike and landing location drive the experience.

Best for: Easy runs and daily training for midfoot strikers who tolerate a tall shoe with notable lateral heel flare

E
EDDBUD Youtube

A wide, stable, durable max-cushion trainer locked into easy and recovery paces, but less bouncy and less versatile than the Vomero Plus.

Best for: Runners wanting a stable, wide, max-cushion easy/recovery shoe with durable PumaGrip outsole

+1 earlier review from EDDBUD

A fantastic wide, cushioned recovery/easy-day option, but too heavy and warm to be as versatile as the Megablast.

Best for: Easy days and recovery runs, especially as part of a larger rotation; good in cooler weather

FR
FORDY RUNS Youtube

Puma smartly reduced weight and improved the Nitro foam, keeping the stable wide platform that defined v1 — the result is a more responsive, more versatile max-stack trainer at a competitive price.

Best for: Max-stack daily training and long runs where the runner also wants to inject marathon-goal-pace work without feeling weighed down.

15 miles tested · source
+1 earlier review from FORDY RUNS

A serious contender in the max-stack performance category — lighter and more responsive than v1, stable, with excellent Puma grip; main drawback is price versus the Vomero Plus.

K
Kofuzi Youtube

A subtle update that firms the foam and nudges the MagMax toward a long run shoe with pep, but the weight keeps it straddling the line between max-cushion and long-run rather than fully committing to either.

Best for: Taller/heavier runners wanting a tall-stack long run shoe with some pep for steady and marathon-pace work

TR
The Run Testers Youtube

A comfortable and well-cushioned daily trainer that excels at easy and long runs with excellent impact protection, but the reviewers found the ride too soft and lacking in energy return compared to rivals like the Nike Vomero Plus, On Cloudsurfer (Rad UFO), and ASICS Super Blast 2, making it less versatile and hard to justify at its price point.

Best for: Easy and long runs where maximum cushioning and impact protection are the priority over responsiveness or versatility.

34 miles tested · source
+4 earlier reviews from The Run Testers

A comfortable, wider, more cushioned modern daily trainer that leans toward easy-run comfort, but its higher price is hard to justify when the Magnify Nitro 3 performs similarly.

Best for: Runners wanting a cushy, supportive max-cushion daily trainer for easy miles and long runs.

31 miles tested · source

A solid, comfortable max-cushion trainer but feels like a fairly standard cushion shoe rather than the explosive super-trainer its positioning suggests.

Best for: Protective, lightweight max-cushion daily trainer for easy miles

31 miles tested · source

Solid, comfortable max-cushion daily trainer with good PumaGrip outsole, but lacks the versatility and bounce of the RAD UFO.

Best for: Workhorse max-cushion daily trainer for easy runs and steady mileage.

31 miles tested · source

The more versatile and lighter of the two max-cushion cruisers, with a softer cradled ride; not a speed shoe, but a good pick for comfortable long sessions.

Best for: Comfortable high-mileage easy and long runs, with enough versatility to handle steady or uptempo long sessions.

31 miles tested · source

Where it sits among similar shoes

Compared to other road daily trainer in the same lane.

Weight · lower = lighter Men's size 9
Puma MagMax Nitro 2
266g
Adidas Supernova Solution 2
266g
ASICS Superblast 2
249g
Adidas Supernova Rise 3
264g
Heel stack · higher = more cushioning mm
Puma MagMax Nitro 2
46.0mm
Adidas Supernova Solution 2
36.0mm
ASICS Superblast 2
46.0mm
Adidas Supernova Rise 3
36.0mm
Drop · higher = more heel-leaning mm
Puma MagMax Nitro 2
8.0mm
Adidas Supernova Solution 2
10.0mm
ASICS Superblast 2
8.0mm
Adidas Supernova Rise 3
8.0mm

Puma MagMax Nitro 2

Data-driven recommendation backed by expert reviews.

Ask the advisor
Methodology. Specs come from manufacturer data and authoritative third-party catalogs. Reviewer verdicts are summarized from named, linked sources — never copied verbatim. We weight clinical and lab-tested sources more heavily than community commentary, but the specific weights stay internal. Never sponsored, never paid placement.
Last updated 2026-05-05